Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

It’s the 10th anniversary of the PCA indictment and the courts are still working on it

By Dan Flynn on January 31, 2023
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
pcaBlakeley_406x250.jpg

This February is the 10th anniversary of the criminal indictment of Peanut Corporation of America’s executives. And the two defendants who remain in federal custody are still actively pursuing release, meaning there have only been a few moments in the past decade when these cases have not been active.

The criminal prosecution of the PCA executives was a milestone in food safety as it meant the food industry was being held responsible for an outbreak that caused hundreds of illnesses and several deaths.

The legal action began in February 2013 when the federal indictments of Stewart Parnell, Michael Parnell, Samuel Lightsey, and Mary Wilkerson were unsealed in a federal court in Albany, GA. A separate indictment for Daniel Kilgore was opened later.

During the four years after the multistate Salmonella outbreak that was linked to PCA peanut butter and paste made at its Georgia plant, little was revealed about the federal criminal investigation that was known to be underway. The unsealed indictments filled in the details.

February 2013 was a busy month. The defendants obtained attorneys, entered their pleas of not guilty and obtained conditions for release. Stewart Parnell, who was chief executive of the already bankrupt PCA, put down $100,000 as bail.

Stewart Parnell, his peanut broker brother Michael, and Mary Wilkerson all went to a jury trial during the following summer. Wilkerson was PCA’s quality control officer. Lightsey and Kilgore, who were plant operations managers, both plead guilty in exchange for consideration from the government at sentencing.

The charges included conspiracy, Introduction of Adulterated Food into Interstate Commerce with intent to defraud or mislead, Introduction of Misbranded Food into Interstate Commerce with intent to defraud or mislead, Mail Fraud, Wire Fraud, and Obstruction of Justice.

Jury convictions would in sentences of 28 years for Stewart Parnell, 20 years for Michael Parnell, and 5 years for Wilkerson. As for the two who took guilty pleas, Kilgore was sentenced to 6 years and Lightsey’s sentence was 3 years. Kilgore, Lightsey, and Wilkerson have all served their time.

All totaled 62 years of prison time was handed out to PCA executives for the indictments that were unsealed 10 years ago in February. The convictions and sentences were all associated with a fatal multistate outbreak of human infections of Salmonella serotype Typhimurium. Confirmed cases occurred from Sept. 1, 2008, to March 21, 2009.

Lab work in Minnesota, Connecticut, Michigan, and Colorado, all helped the FDA connect the outbreak to PCA’s King Nut peanut butter made in Blakely, GA. Hundreds of other peanut butter brands and products containing peanut paste were recalled.

The PCA convictions and sentences were reviewed on appeal to the 11th Circuit of U.S. District Court in Atlanta and were upheld. But that wasn’t the end of appeal options

Since 2019, the Parnell brothers separately have been pursuing Habeous Corpus motions to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentences under what is known as Section 2255 proceedings.

Both are essentially claiming infective trial counsel. They won public hearings that required all their trial attorneys to testify, but Magistrate Judge Thomas Q. Langstaff ruled against them.

Judge W. Louis Sands, the trial judge, has upheld Langstaff in the Stewart Parnell case. In the final days of 2022, Stewart Parnell appealed his HabeousCorpus case to the 11 Circuit Court of Appeals in Atlanta. Michael Parnell is still waiting on Judge Sands to issue an opinion in his case.

“In his § 2255 motion, Petitioner(Stewart Parnell) sets out two (2) grounds for relief, raising the following ineffective assistance of counsel claims pertaining to his retained trial representation:

1. Counsel provided ineffective assistance in failing to seek a change of venue due to adverse pretrial publicity, jurors’ preconceived notions, and the amount of media exposure throughout the entire division of this Court.

2. Counsel provided ineffective assistance in failing to move to strike-for-cause jurors with knowledge of the allegations of death caused by the salmonella outbreak.”

While they wait, 68-year-old Stewart Parnell remains incarcerated at the Hazelton federal prison in South Carolina with a release date that is 15 years out on July 7, 2038. Brother Michael, 64, is waiting for an Oct. 1, 2031, release fate at the federal lockup at Fort Dix, NJ.

(To sign up for a free subscription to Food Safety News, click here.)

Photo of Dan Flynn Dan Flynn

Editor Dan Flynn is a Northern Colorado-based writer and editor with more more than 15 years of food safety experience. As a public affairs professional, he worked with government and regulatory agencies at the local, state, and federal levels. His career as a…

Editor Dan Flynn is a Northern Colorado-based writer and editor with more more than 15 years of food safety experience. As a public affairs professional, he worked with government and regulatory agencies at the local, state, and federal levels. His career as a journalist included working for newspapers throughout the West, from the Black Hills to Seattle. His on-scene reporting on the collapse of the Idaho’s Teton Dam and the suicide bombing at Washington State University’s Perham Hall was carried by newspapers around the world and was recognized both times regionally by the Associated Press for Best Reporting on a Deadline. Most of the disasters he attends these days involve food illnesses.

Email
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Criminal
  • Blog:
    Food Safety News
  • Organization:
    Marler Clark, Inc., PS
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo