Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Cannabis Legal Report—Week of April 17, 2023

By Elizabeth Gustafson, Tommy Tobin & Hanna Barker Mullin on April 20, 2023
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Cannabis: In Focus

  • US Sentencing Commission Seeks Amendment To Allow for More Lenient Treatment for People With Prior Cannabis Convictions
  • Second Circuit Narrows TRO Affecting New York State Cannabis Retail Licensing

US Sentencing Commission Seeks Amendment To Allow for More Lenient Treatment for People With Prior Cannabis Convictions

The U.S. Sentencing Commission approved a series of amendments to current sentencing guidelines on April 5, 2023. Among the proposed changes, certain amendments aim to treat those with prior cannabis charges with more leniency. Currently, the guidelines advise judges to take prior cannabis convictions into consideration as part of an individual’s criminal history when sentencing in new, unrelated cases.

The amendments suggest that a downward departure of previously calculated criminal history points may be warranted when a defendant had a prior conviction for simple possession of cannabis. The amendments will be sent to Congress by May 1, 2023, and may be effective as early as November 1, 2023.

Second Circuit Narrows TRO Affecting New York State Cannabis Retail Licensing

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit narrowed a temporary restraining order (TRO) on March 28, 2023, affecting issuance of adult-use cannabis dispensary licenses. Previously, a TRO had limited the state issuing licenses in five regions of the state. With the partial lifting of the TRO, dispensary licenses may be issued in Central New York, Western New York, Mid-Hudson, and Brooklyn regions of the state. Licenses in the Finger Lakes region remain under the TRO.

In the suit, an out-of-state applicant challenged New York requirements for social equity dispensary license applicants. Specifically, the out-of-state applicant challenged requirements that applicants (1) have a “significant presence” in New York and (2) that the entity was owned or controlled by a “justice-involved” individual. A “justice-involved” individual is someone who was convicted of a cannabis-related offense, has family or a dependent with such a conviction, or is a dependent of someone with a conviction.

The court’s narrowing of the TRO comes weeks after the state’s cannabis authorities announced they would double the number of available licenses for recreational dispensaries from 150 to 300.

Elizabeth Gustafson

Elizabeth Gustafson has extensive experience with intellectual property and trademark litigation, antitrust, internal and government investigations, and breach of contract claims.

Read more about Elizabeth GustafsonEmail
Photo of Tommy Tobin Tommy Tobin

Thomas Tobin’s practice focuses on complex commercial litigation and class action matters involving statutory, constitutional, and regulatory issues in a range of industries, including food and beverage, consumer packaged goods, and cannabis. In the food and beverage sector, Tommy has experience defending false…

Thomas Tobin’s practice focuses on complex commercial litigation and class action matters involving statutory, constitutional, and regulatory issues in a range of industries, including food and beverage, consumer packaged goods, and cannabis. In the food and beverage sector, Tommy has experience defending false advertising claims and consumer protection claims for well-known international corporations.

Read more about Tommy TobinEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Cannabis
  • Blog:
    Cannabis Legal Highlights
  • Organization:
    Perkins Coie LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo