Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherBrowse by ChannelAbout the NetworkJoin the NetworkProductsSub-MenuProducts OverviewBlog ProBlog PlusBlog PremierMicrositeSyndication PortalsAbout UsContactSubscribeSupport
Book a Demo
Search
Close

FDIC Proposes Potential Reforms to Deposit Insurance in the U.S. Banking System

By Daniel C. McKay, II, James W. Morrissey, James M. Kane, Jennifer Durham King, Mark C. Svalina, Mary Donohue, Kelly Miller & Nicholas S. Zlevor on May 5, 2023
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
FDIC_blog post image

On May 1, 2023, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the “FDIC”) released a comprehensive discussion and analysis of potential courses of action that could be taken to reform the deposit insurance system in response to the recent string of failures of insured depository institutions.  The three options for reform are briefly described below:

  1. Limited Coverage.  Maintaining the status quo pursuant to which there is a set limit to deposit insurance applied across all depositors and types of accounts.  This option contemplates a potential limit increase; however, the policy of a finite and uniform coverage ceiling would remain in place.
  2. Unlimited Coverage.  Providing full coverage across the board by completely removing the deposit insurance limits for all depositors and types of accounts.  The FDIC is of the opinion that unlimited coverage could have dramatic distorting effects on the broader market at large by stimulating a sharp increase in consumer demand for deposit products, thereby giving deposits a competitive edge in comparison to other types of assets.
  3. Targeted Coverage.  Setting aside the current one-size-fits-all approach to deposit insurance and allowing for deposit insurance limits to be applied at different levels across different types of depositors and types of accounts (e.g., increasing coverage to business payment accounts).  The FDIC believes that differentiating between business payment accounts and other types of deposits or investment accounts would provide specialized support to banks without substantial disruptions in other asset markets.

The full report (which can be found here) discusses the recent bank failures, provides a detailed history of deposit insurance in the United States and examines the impact each option could have on the Deposit Insurance Fund’s adequacy, financial stability, depositor discipline and the broader market landscape.

Photo of Daniel C. McKay, II Daniel C. McKay, II
Read more about Daniel C. McKay, IIEmail
Photo of James W. Morrissey James W. Morrissey
Read more about James W. MorrisseyEmail
Photo of James M. Kane James M. Kane
Read more about James M. KaneEmail
Photo of Jennifer Durham King Jennifer Durham King
Read more about Jennifer Durham KingEmail
Photo of Mark C. Svalina Mark C. Svalina
Read more about Mark C. SvalinaEmail
Photo of Mary Donohue Mary Donohue
Read more about Mary DonohueEmail
  • Posted in:
    Financial
  • Blog:
    The 21st Century Banker
  • Organization:
    Vedder Price PC
  • Article: View Original Source

LexBlog, Inc. logo
Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
Real Lawyers
99 Park Row
  • About LexBlog
  • Careers
  • Press
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Privacy Policy
  • Editorial Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Service
  • RSS Terms of Service
  • Products
  • Blog Pro
  • Blog Plus
  • Blog Premier
  • Microsite
  • Syndication Portals
  • LexBlog Community
  • Resource Center
  • 1-800-913-0988
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
  • Resource Center
  • Blogging 101

New to the Network

  • Beyond the First 100 Days
  • In the Legal Interest
  • Cooking with SALT
  • The Fiduciary Litigator
  • CCN Mexico Report™
Copyright © 2025, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo