Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

HHS Recommends Moving Cannabis to Schedule III

By Andrew Kline & Hanna Barker Mullin on August 30, 2023
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Politico and Bloomberg both reported today that the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) is officially recommending that marijuana be moved to Schedule III from Schedule I under the Controlled Substances Act (CSA), a historic shift that indicates the top health agency no longer considers cannabis to have high abuse potential with no medical value.

The rescheduling recommendation is not binding on the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), but DEA is statutorily obligated to accept HHS’s scientific and medical evaluation. If DEA decides to reschedule cannabis, the agency will go through a rulemaking process that includes a public comment period before issuing a final rule.

This development follows the completion of a scientific review into cannabis directed by President Biden last October. Marijuana is presently listed in Schedule I under the CSA, subjecting it to the greatest level of control reserved for substances deemed to have “no accepted medical use” and a “high potential for abuse.” As a result of its classification, state-licensed cannabis businesses operate under extreme regulatory burdens.

Lawyers and business professionals from Perkins Coie were instrumental in formulating the Coalition for Cannabis Scheduling Reform (CCSR), a diverse group of cannabis companies and scientific and legal authorities. In June, CCSR released a comprehensive report on the federal classification of cannabis co-authored by Andrew Kline, Co-Chair of Perkins Coie’s Cannabis Industry Group, with support from associate Tommy Tobin, and edited by paralegal Hanna Barker Mullin.

CCSR made the case in its report that marijuana is improperly placed in the same schedule as drugs like heroin and argues that the more appropriate options are to either remove the plant from the list of controlled substances altogether or reschedule it to Schedule III or below. The report outlines the scientific, economic, legal, and social justice considerations of these options compared to the status quo.

While cannabis would remain federally illegal under Schedule III, the reclassification would remove Internal Revenue Code Section 280E tax penalty, which prevents businesses “trafficking” in schedule I and II substances from taking deductions for ordinary business expenses, resulting in an effective tax rate of up to 80%. Rescheduling would eliminate this financial burden, providing much needed relief for regulated cannabis businesses. Moving cannabis out of schedule I would also eliminate a major obstacle for researchers, who presently must register with DEA to access cannabis for use in medical and scientific studies.

Perkins Coie is proud of its support for this burgeoning industry and will be working tirelessly to get this policy change over the finish line in the coming weeks.

Photo of Andrew Kline Andrew Kline

Andrew Kline leverages his more than thirty years of law and policy experience in his diverse practice. He counsels clients in established and emerging industries on regulatory compliance, due diligence, internal investigations, privacy, public policy, and litigation strategy.

Read more about Andrew KlineEmail
  • Posted in:
    Cannabis
  • Blog:
    Cannabis Legal Highlights
  • Organization:
    Perkins Coie LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo