Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherBrowse by ChannelAbout the NetworkJoin the NetworkProductsSub-MenuProducts OverviewBlog ProBlog PlusBlog PremierMicrositeSyndication PortalsAbout UsContactSubscribeSupport
Book a Demo
Search
Close

How to Deal with Retainage on Alabama Public Projects

By David W. Owen, Mason Rollins & Bradley on October 26, 2023
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
How to Deal with Retainage on Alabama Public Projects

Retainage can be tricky in Alabama, particularly on public projects. In this post, we address retainage on public projects for public owners in the state (e.g., a governmental board, commission, agency, body, authority, instrumentality, or department).

A public owner in Alabama may withhold up to 5% retainage from the prime contractor for up to 50% percent project completion (Ala. Code § 39-2-12). However, after 50% completion of the project has been accomplished, the owner cannot withhold additional retainage. While this statute is clear about how public owners should withhold retainage from prime contractors, it is not specific about how contractors should treat retainage for downstream subcontractors and suppliers. This statute also does not address whether payment bond sureties are responsible if the contractor fails to pay the subcontractor or supplier retainage.

Although not directly on point, in Keller Constr. Co. of Nw. Fla., Inc. v. Hartford First Ins. Co., the Alabama Civil Court of Appeals provided some guidance on how to treat retainage for downstream subcontractors on public projects. In that case, the Civil Court of Appeals held that a contractor and surety have no obligation to pay retainage downstream that the public owner has not paid to the contractor if the subcontract includes a pay-if-paid clause (generally requires the contractor to pay a subcontractor or supplier only if the contractor receives payment from the owner for the subcontractor’s or supplier’s work). For contractors, this means that they do not have to come out of pocket to pay retainage funds to subcontractors and suppliers. Instead, contractors can wait to pay the subcontractors and suppliers retainage once the public owner releases the retainage to the contractor. 

To better manage the release of retainage on public projects in Alabama, contractors may benefit from including pay-if-paid clauses in their subcontracts. Alternatively, contractors should consider tying release of retainage to whatever the trigger is for release from the public owner in the prime contract. That should help mitigate the risk of a contractor having to fund retainage to suppliers or subcontractors whose work is completed early on in a public project, while the owner is still holding such funds from the contractor. If you have any questions about retainage or other Alabama construction law issues, please do not hesitate to reach out to David Owen or Mason Rollins.

Photo of David W. Owen David W. Owen

As chair of Bradley’s Construction Practice Group and co-chair of the Energy team, David Owen concentrates his practice in construction, where he represents contractors, subcontractors, engineers and owners in private and government contract matters. View articles by David

Read more about David W. OwenEmail
Photo of Mason Rollins Mason Rollins

As an associate in the Construction Practice Group, Mason Rollins represents general contractors, subcontractors, owners, architects, and engineers related to the many issues that may arise related to construction. His practice focuses on assisting clients both before and after problems arise by drafting…

As an associate in the Construction Practice Group, Mason Rollins represents general contractors, subcontractors, owners, architects, and engineers related to the many issues that may arise related to construction. His practice focuses on assisting clients both before and after problems arise by drafting contracts designed to best position clients to avoid disputes, as well as litigating and arbitrating matters to final resolution. Mason regularly litigates disputes involving breach of contract, construction defects, project delays, differing site conditions, change orders and additional work, contract termination, lien and bond claims, design, and insurance coverage issues.

Email
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Real Estate & Construction
  • Blog:
    BuildSmart
  • Organization:
    Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

LexBlog, Inc. logo
Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
Real Lawyers
99 Park Row
  • About LexBlog
  • Careers
  • Press
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Privacy Policy
  • Editorial Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Service
  • RSS Terms of Service
  • Products
  • Blog Pro
  • Blog Plus
  • Blog Premier
  • Microsite
  • Syndication Portals
  • LexBlog Community
  • Resource Center
  • 1-800-913-0988
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
  • Resource Center
  • Blogging 101

New to the Network

  • Beyond the First 100 Days
  • In the Legal Interest
  • Cooking with SALT
  • The Fiduciary Litigator
  • CCN Mexico Report™
Copyright © 2025, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo