Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

FTC Noncompete Ban Already Challenged, Unlikely to Ever Take Effect

By Thomas J. McGoey II & Ellen D. George on April 24, 2024
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Sign,On,Doorway,For,The,Federal,Trade,Commission,In,Washington

On April 23, the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) voted 3-2 to ban noncompete agreements, which prevent employees from working for competitors or launching a competing business after they leave a job. The FTC’s new rule is slated to go into effect 120 days after it is published in the Federal Register. Whether the rule will ever actually take effect, however, is uncertain.

The FTC first proposed a noncompete ban in January 2023, estimating that the rule would increase earnings by almost $300 billion each year. After publishing its proposal, the FTC received more than 26,000 public comments. The rule’s final version, which is somewhat narrower than the original proposed rule, nullifies nearly all noncompete agreements and imposes a notice requirement on employers. 

There are three important takeaways from the final rule. After the rule’s effective date:

  • All existing noncompete agreements with non-senior executives are unenforceable.  Existing noncompete agreements with senior executives (i.e., workers earning more than $151,164 annually and who are in policy-making positions), on the other hand, are enforceable. 
  • Employers are banned from entering into or attempting to enforce all new noncompete agreements, even those with senior executives.
  • Employers must provide notice to workers bound to an existing noncompete agreement that the agreement will not be enforced against them in the future.

Importantly, there are two instances in which the final rule does not apply: (1) to non-compete agreements entered into by a person pursuant to a bona fide sale of a business entity; and (2) when a cause of action related to a noncompete agreement accrued prior to the rule’s effective date. This second instance occurs when, for example, an employer alleges that a worker accepted employment in breach of a noncompete agreement and the alleged breach occurred prior to the rule’s effective date1.

The rule faces multiple challenges, so employers need not act yet.  It is unclear whether the FTC has the legal authority to issue the rule without an express directive from Congress.  Moreover, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce filed suit challenging the rule this morning. Even if the new rule overcomes these expected challenges, becomes effective, and preempts state laws governing noncompete agreements, employers have alternatives. For example, employers concerned about protecting their intellectual assets and investments can use confidentiality agreements and trade secret laws – two restraints specifically endorsed by the FTC.

For now, employers can still use their existing, enforceable noncompete agreements and enter into new ones. Liskow employment lawyers Thomas J. McGoey II and Ellen D. George will continue to monitor the rule’s developments and are available to field any questions about the rule and its application to your business. To learn more about the firm’s Labor & Employment practice, click here.

1According to the FTC, “[t]he final rule does not render any existing non-competes unenforceable or invalid from the date of their origin.  Instead, under the final rule, it is an unfair method of competition to enforce certain non-competes beginning on the effective date.”  Non-Compete Clause Rule, Federal Trade Commission, (emphasis in original) (last visited Apr. 23, 2024). 

Disclaimer: This Blog/Web Site is made available by the law firm of Liskow & Lewis, APLC (“Liskow & Lewis”) and the individual Liskow & Lewis lawyers posting to this site for educational purposes and to give you general information and a general understanding of the law only, not to provide specific legal advice as to an identified problem or issue. By using this blog site you understand and acknowledge that there is no attorney-client relationship formed between you and Liskow & Lewis and/or the individual Liskow & Lewis lawyers posting to this site by virtue of your using this site. The Blog/Web Site should not be used as a substitute for legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state regarding a particular matter.

Privacy Policy: By subscribing to Liskow & Lewis’ E-Communications, you will receive articles and blogs with insight and analysis of legal issues that may impact your industry. Communications include firm news, insights, and events. To receive information from Liskow & Lewis, your information will be kept in a secured contact database. If at any time you would like to unsubscribe, please use the SafeUnsubscribe® link located at the bottom of every email that you receive.

Photo of Thomas J. McGoey II Thomas J. McGoey II

Tommy is the leader of the firm’s commercial litigation practice group and a former member of the firm’s Board of Directors. He is a go-to labor and employment lawyer with experience throughout Louisiana and the U.S. With his nearly 35 years of experience…

Tommy is the leader of the firm’s commercial litigation practice group and a former member of the firm’s Board of Directors. He is a go-to labor and employment lawyer with experience throughout Louisiana and the U.S. With his nearly 35 years of experience, he helps employers across a wide range of industries with contentious human resources claims and issues, both inside and outside the courtroom. Most recently, he has guided employers through a range of concerns related to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Read more about Thomas J. McGoey IIEmail
Show more Show less
Photo of Ellen D. George Ellen D. George

Ellie George is an associate in the firm’s Commercial Litigation practice group. Her practice focuses on labor and employment issues and derivative actions. She received her Juris Doctor, summa cum laude, from Tulane Law School in 2021, where she graduated first in…

Ellie George is an associate in the firm’s Commercial Litigation practice group. Her practice focuses on labor and employment issues and derivative actions. She received her Juris Doctor, summa cum laude, from Tulane Law School in 2021, where she graduated first in her class with a 4.0.  While at Tulane, she received the Faculty Medal for distinguished academic achievement over all three years of law school and was inducted into the Order of the Coif honorary scholastic society. She also served as a Notes & Comments editor of the Tulane Law Review.

Prior to joining the firm, Ellie served as a law clerk to the Honorable Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit and to the Honorable Barry W. Ashe of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana. She also served as a judicial extern to the Honorable Lance M. Africk of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana.

Prior to joining the firm, Ellie served as a law clerk to the Honorable Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit and to the Honorable Barry W. Ashe of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana. She also served as a judicial extern to the Honorable Lance M. Africk of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana.

Read more about Ellen D. GeorgeEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Employment & Labor
  • Blog:
    Gulf Coast Business Law Blog
  • Organization:
    Liskow & Lewis
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo