Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherBrowse by ChannelAbout the NetworkJoin the NetworkProductsSub-MenuProducts OverviewBlog ProBlog PlusBlog PremierMicrositeSyndication PortalsAbout UsContactSubscribeSupport
Book a Demo
Search
Close

NLRB Finds GW Hospital Failed to Bargain in Good Faith in Reversal of Vacated Decision

By Christopher Williams, John Bolesta, Keahn Morris & James Hays on May 13, 2024
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Blog Image Union

On May 8, 2024, the National Labor Relations Board (“Board”) issued a decision reversing a 2021 decision the Board previously vacated after former Board Member William Emanuel, who participated in the ruling, was found to have broken ethics rules by failing to recuse himself from the case. In the decision, the Board held that George Washington University Hospital (“GW Hospital”) violated the National Labor Relations Act (the “Act”) by unilaterally withdrawing its recognition of a union and refusing to bargain in good faith. See The George Washington Univ. Hosp., L.P., 373 NLRB No. 55 (2024).

In November 2016, GW Hospital and the Service Employees International Union (“Union”) began bargaining in advance of the expiration of the collective bargaining agreement that covered a bargaining unit of approximately 150 service employees. GW Hospital took a hard line throughout bargaining, refusing to concede on its proposals, which included a management-rights clause that gave the hospital the power to change health benefits and discipline workers without cause, the addition of a no-strike provision, nonbinding mediation in lieu of mandatory arbitration, and provisions that would have given the hospital the power to unilaterally set wages and end the Union’s right to dues check-off.

In 2018, after two years of bargaining with little progress, GW Hospital received a decertification provision signed by 81 of 156 employees in the bargaining unit and immediately withdrew recognition of the Union and cancelled future bargaining sessions. Thereafter, the hospital implemented new wage rates and a new compensation structure.

Initially, the Board reversed the Administrative Law Judge in its vacated 2021 decision, finding that GW Hospital’s actions were “hard bargaining,” but did not violate the Act. In the re-issued decision, the Democratic Board majority held that GW Hospital did violate the Act – finding that the employer’s proposals were “precisely the type that have been deemed by the Board and the courts to show bad faith bargaining” because “taken as a whole, [they] would have left employees and the union with substantially fewer rights and less protection than provided by law without a contract.” 373 NLRB No. 55 at *4. The Board ordered GW Hospital to bargain with the Union, directed it to rescind the rules it issued after failing to reach an agreement, and ordered it to pay the Union’s bargaining expenses and loss of benefits incurred due to its actions.

This decision is one of three other cases vacated by the NLRB following an investigation that former Board member Emanuel held a conflicting financial interest that should have disqualified him from participation. GW Hospital is the third of those decisions to be re-issued, joining cases involving ExxonMobil Corp. and Marathon Petroleum Corp. The Board also vacated a decision involving CVS Health Corp., but has not re-issued its decision.

Photo of Christopher Williams Christopher Williams

Christopher Williams is an associate in the Labor and Employment Practice Group in the firm’s Washington, D.C. office.

Read more about Christopher WilliamsEmail
Photo of John Bolesta John Bolesta

John Bolesta is special counsel in the Labor and Employment Practice Group in the firm’s Washington, D.C. office.

Read more about John BolestaEmail
Photo of Keahn Morris Keahn Morris

Keahn Morris is a partner in the Labor and Employment Practice Group in the firm’s San Francisco office.

Read more about Keahn MorrisEmail
Photo of James Hays James Hays

James Hays is of counsel in the firm’s New York office and a leader of the Traditional Labor Law Team.

Read more about James HaysEmail
  • Posted in:
    Employment & Labor
  • Blog:
    Labor & Employment Law Blog
  • Organization:
    Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

LexBlog, Inc. logo
Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
Real Lawyers
99 Park Row
  • About LexBlog
  • Careers
  • Press
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Privacy Policy
  • Editorial Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Service
  • RSS Terms of Service
  • Products
  • Blog Pro
  • Blog Plus
  • Blog Premier
  • Microsite
  • Syndication Portals
  • LexBlog Community
  • Resource Center
  • 1-800-913-0988
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
  • Resource Center
  • Blogging 101

New to the Network

  • Tennessee Insurance Litigation Blog
  • Claims & Sustains
  • New Jersey Restraining Order Lawyers
  • New Jersey Gun Lawyers
  • Blog of Reason
Copyright © 2025, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo