Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupport
Contact Us
Search
Close

Weight loss drugs and service in Denmark

By Aaron Lukken on May 21, 2024
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Auto-Injector Pen for the treatment of Diabetes
Haberdoedas, Unsplash

(Update, November, 2025: In addition to personal injury suits, the number of anti-trust suits against Novo Nordisk has increased lately as well. Same calculus involved– there’s only one valid way to serve if the company won’t waive. But there are some quirks involved.)

Latest trend in litigation nationwide: Danish pharmaceutical manufacturer Novo Nordisk and its subsidiaries, sued in the United States for dramatically adverse effects of Ozempic and Wegovy. At issue is the relative safety of two medications that were originally approved for treating different yet closely related (diabetes and cardiovascular recovery) maladies, but have been found dramatically effective in treating obesity. This post disregards merits of the suits,* and focuses solely on procedural requirements to launch them.

So, what’s necessary in serving Novo Nordisk? Not anything out of the ordinary, really. Our how-to guide on service of process in Denmark lays out all the particulars of service pursuant to the Hague Service Convention, but one issue is important to keep in mind: Denmark’s position on translation. Here it is, verbatim:

A translation is not required; in the case of an untranslated document, however, the addressee is informed that he is not, under Danish law, under an obligation to accept it.

A bit of a challenge, that. Very rare is the Dane who doesn’t speak English as well as I do– seriously. Technically, you shouldn’t have to worry if your pleadings are solely in English. But many of my clients do worry, and they pay for a pro to turn everything into Danish. Why? It’s tough to say whether the serving officer in Bagsværd will be adamant about that or whether the N.N. staff member who receives the documents will be recalcitrant. If they refuse, the plaintiff goes back to the drawing board and starts all over with the translation,.

Now, fortunately, the Danish authorities are pretty quick, only taking two or three months to return proof of service, but it’s still a gamble, and if the pleadings are relatively short, it won’t cost much to translate.

While the suits are barreling headlong into full MDL status, many must nonetheless be served now. Eventually, as the suits become more consolidated in Chicago (N.D. Ill.), and eventually defense counsel will be compelled to accept, service will be progressively less necessary.

But for now, from a service of process perspective, these cases are not extraordinary. There aren’t special rules for them, and there’s not an exemption from Hague requirements unless they waive or somebody in the United States waives or accepts for the offshore defendants.


* Full disclosure: I’ve struggled with weight my entire adult life, my entire adolescence, and much of my childhood. This culminated with literally life-saving gastric bypass surgery twenty years ago. This issue is personal. I’m still fighting it at 52, and actually pondering these medications, but also realizing that fewer beers and a couple more sessions at the YMCA every week would go a long way toward the goal. [In April, 2025, the pondering was over and I started a course of tirzepatide– marketed as “Zepbound” by Eli Lilly. Eight months on, it’s working beautifully.]

Photo of Aaron Lukken Aaron Lukken

I’m Aaron Lukken, and I wasn’t always a lawyer. My kid sister and I spent a few years abroad as Army brats, and I worked in politics for a while after college. After meandering from job to job in my late twenties, I…

I’m Aaron Lukken, and I wasn’t always a lawyer. My kid sister and I spent a few years abroad as Army brats, and I worked in politics for a while after college. After meandering from job to job in my late twenties, I finally found a home at the phone company, of all places. With a decade of telecom sales experience under my belt, I decided at 37 to finally go back and do what I had always intended… study law.

But even at the start of law school, the idea of a generalized practice never really made sense to me. I wanted something specific, and something that could draw on all the travels of my youth; the only area of the law that was really appealing to me was at the international level. Of course, I also heard the siren call of the courtroom as a 2L, and discovered that litigation was as exciting as geopolitics and international law.

With a whole bunch of luck—and an amazingly supportive wife—I managed to launch a little niche firm smack in the middle of the map… Viking Advocates, LLC in Kansas City (that’s in Missouri, thankyouverymuch). My practice combines treaty analysis with litigation strategy; I truly have the best of both worlds.

When I’m not pondering the intricacies of cross-border legal doctrines, I’m either singing 2nd Tenor with the Kansas City Symphony Chorus or trying to get down to my fighting weight at the local YMCA with my wife, Peggy (an expert in conflict management and dispute resolution). Together we have a small civil & domestic mediation firm serving clients in the KC region. Our overbearing and demanding boss is a tabby cat named Minnie, named after Professor Minerva McGonagall.

Feel free to connect with me on LinkedIn (be sure to tell me you saw this!).

Read more about Aaron LukkenEmailAaron's Linkedin Profile
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Health Care and Life Sciences
  • Blog:
    Hague Law Blog
  • Organization:
    Viking Advocates, LLC
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo