The Personal Information Protection Law (“PIPL“) requires a data controller to conduct compliance audits of its personal data processing activities on a regular basis (“Self-supervision Audits“). Apart from such Self-supervision Audits, in case the data regulator finds significant risks involved in a data controller’s processing or where data incidents occur, the data regulator has the authority to request the data controller to engage third party professional organizations to conduct compliance audits (“Regulator Requested Audits“). However, despite of these general principles, the PIPL provides no further details regarding how these audits shall be conducted.
In July 2024, a draft recommended national standard Personal Information Protection Compliance Audit Requirements (“Draft Standard“) was issued for public consultation, which sets out comprehensive audit requirements and procedures. To be specific:
- The Draft Standard includes in its Schedule C a list of 37 groups of specific processing operations that must be checked in an audit, as well as the relevant PIPL requirements. The requirements cover the full life cycle of personal data processing, and concern areas such as lawful bases of processing, necessity and data minimization principles, disclosure of necessary processing details to data subjects, sharing of personal data with third parties, automated decision making, public disclosure of personal data, CCTV, sensitive personal data and minor data protection, cross-border data transfers, data subjects’ rights, internal data protection policies and procedures, technical and organizational measures, DPO, personal data protection impact assessments, data incidents, etc.
- The Draft Standard also outlines the general procedures of an audit, and sample lists the documents and materials which must be reviewed during an audit.
- In addition, the Draft Standard emphasizes the importance of internal governance. It requires a data controller to establish a compliance audit management system and formulate audit rules and procedures. The data controller’s Board of Directors, DPO and/or Legal Representative must take ultimate responsibility for the establishment of audit system and implementation of audits within the organization. The data controller must also allocate sufficient finance and suitable human resources to audit related work. Personnel being appointed to handle audits related works must have suitable knowledge and experience, and ideally hold qualification certificates.
- The Draft Standard does not prescribe when or how often a data controller must conduct an audit. In the Measures for the Management of Compliance Audits on the Protection of Personal Information (Draft for Comments) (“Draft Measures“), which was issued in September 2023 for public consultation, it is stated that a data controller which processes more than one million individuals’ personal data must conduct Self-supervision Audits at least once a year. Other data controllers must conduct Self-supervision Audits at least once every two years.
- The Draft Measures require data controllers to submit the audit reports of Regulator Requested Audits, take necessary remediation actions, and then submit the post-remediation reports.
As of the date of this article, neither the Draft Standard nor the Draft Measures have been finalized. But there are rumours indicating that both will be finalized before the end of 2024. An increasingly common understanding in the market is that personal data compliance audits will become the next regulatory focus of the data regulator.
Regardless of the status of these drafts, a data controller has an obligation under the PIPL to conduct Self-supervision Audits periodically. It is, thus, recommended to take note of the requirements under the Draft Standard, consider establishing an internal audit management framework and complete at least one Self-supervsion Audit within a reasonable time.