Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupport
Contact Us
Search
Close

SEC Announces Settlements with Seven Public Companies for Violations of Exchange Act Whistleblower Protections in Employee and Consulting Agreements

By Charles Frohman, Celia Cohen, Michael Robotti & Ana María Blanco on September 16, 2024
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

The SEC has begun to bring enforcement actions against companies whose employment and client agreements could appear to infringe on the right to report cases in violation of Section 21f-17(a) of the Exchange Act. On September 9, 2024, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced that it settled charges against seven public companies for more than $3 million in combined civil penalties for including language in their employment, consulting and other agreements that potentially discourages whistleblowers from reporting issues to outside authorities.

The SEC charged the companies with violating the whistleblower protections in the Exchange Act by requiring employees, contractors, and/or former employees to forego their right to file a complaint with a government agency, to notify them of any disclosure required by a court or government agency, or to waive their right to receive a financial reward for making any such report. The seven companies agreed to pay civil penalties ranging from $19,500 to $1,386,000, totaling more than $3 million. Notably, in each case, the SEC made no finding that any company had actually attempted to enforce the challenged restrictions. The SEC determined that the provisions alone created impediments to participation in the whistleblower program because they required individuals to forego the financial incentives that are intended to encourage persons to report possible securities law violations. For more information about these SEC charges, see Ballard’s legal alert, Are Whistleblower Protection Violations the New SEC Sweep?

Public and private companies should review their employment agreements, consulting contracts, and customer agreements to ensure that there is no language that could be considered discouraging to potential whistleblowers, regardless of whether the company has an explicit whistleblower policy that encourages whistleblowers to report violations to government agencies. Ballard Spahr’s Labor and Employment and Securities Enforcement and Corporate Governance Litigation teams routinely advise public companies on and prepare their employment-related agreements to ensure they remain compliant with current law and agency initiatives.

Michael Robotti

Michael P. Robotti | robottim@ballardspahr.com | 646.346.8020 | view full bio

As a member of the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of New York for nearly eight years, Mike served as deputy chief of the International Narcotics & Money Laundering section…

Michael P. Robotti | robottim@ballardspahr.com | 646.346.8020 | view full bio

As a member of the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of New York for nearly eight years, Mike served as deputy chief of the International Narcotics & Money Laundering section and as senior trial counsel for the Business and Securities Fraud section. Mike was a member of the trial team that prosecuted Joaquín “El Chapo” Guzmán Loera—the leader of the Sinaloa Cartel, the world’s largest drug cartel.  Mike handles internal and government investigations, white collar defense and complex litigation. He also advises financial institutions and businesses on their BSA/AML obligations, as well as other compliance requirements, with a focus on issues involving cannabis, cryptocurrency—including scams and theft—and anti-corruption.

Read more about Michael RobottiEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Banking, Finance and Securities
  • Blog:
    HR Law Watch
  • Organization:
    Ballard Spahr LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo