With Election Day just weeks away, employers should quickly brush up on laws that permit employees to take time off to vote.  There is no federal law permitting time off to vote, but a majority of states and the District of Columbia have some form of voting leave law, with variations regarding the amount of time off, whether the leave must be paid, and notice and other requirements.  Here’s an overview of what to look out for:

Eligibility.  Many states tie eligibility for voting leave to the question of whether an employee lacks sufficient hours outside of work to vote when polls are open.  For example, Arizona, California, Colorado, Illinois, Maryland, and some other states make voting leave available only for employees who, based on their scheduled work hours and the hours that the polls are open in their state, do not have at least two or three hours outside of working time to be able to vote.  New York makes the leave available to employees who do not have at least four hours to vote outside of work hours.

Length of Time Off.  Laws vary in the length of time an employee may take off to vote.  Many laws impose a two-hour limit, such as the laws of the District of Columbia, Illinois, and New York; a few allow employees up to three or four hours; and still others, like California, Minnesota, and Texas, do not specify a limit but require that employees be permitted to take the “necessary” time to vote.

Paid or Unpaid Leave.  Crucially, most laws require employees be paid for the time off to vote, or a portion of it.  For example, California, Colorado, New York, and the District of Columbia permit employers to limit paid leave to two hours, and employers cannot require employees to use another form of paid time off (PTO) in an employee’s existing PTO bank.  Some laws are silent on payment, while others impose unique rules.  For example, Illinois requires that employees must be paid for time off to vote in general or special elections, but the statute is silent about primary elections.  

Notice to Employees of Time Off to Vote.  Employers should be aware of workplace posting requirements.  California requires employers to post a notice (available here) in a conspicuous place at least ten days prior to every statewide election.  District of Columbia employers must post a notice (available here) prominently in the workplace at least 60 days before a scheduled election, or for remote employees, provide notice by email or other reasonable means and obtain a signed acknowledgement of receipt.  And New York employers must post a notice (available here) at least ten days before an election and through the time polls close.

Required Advance Notice from Employees.  Some voting leave laws require employees to provide advance notice of their intent to take time off to vote.  For instance, California requires employees to provide at least two working days’ notice before an election if, on the third working day before the election, the employee knows or has reason to know they will need time off to vote. The District of Columbia requires an employee to request leave a reasonable time in advance, consistent with the employer’s leave policy, or at least seven days before the leave in the absence of a policy. New York requires two days’ advance notice but not more than ten days.  Some jurisdictions require only a “reasonable” amount of notice, and others are silent on the issue of notice. 

Anti-Retaliation.  As a general matter, many voting leave laws prohibit employers from disciplining, discharging, or taking other adverse action against a worker who requests or takes time off to vote consistent with the provisions of the statute.   

*          *          *

Given the variations in voting leave laws, employers should be certain to check the applicable requirements based on where their employees are located.  Many voting leave rules are available on state board of election or secretary of state websites.

Photo of Lindsay Burke Lindsay Burke

Lindsay Burke co-chairs the firm’s Employment Practice Group and regularly advises U.S., international, and multinational employers on employee management and culture issues and international HR compliance. She is a key member of the firm’s Institutional Culture and Social Responsibility practice, working together with…

Lindsay Burke co-chairs the firm’s Employment Practice Group and regularly advises U.S., international, and multinational employers on employee management and culture issues and international HR compliance. She is a key member of the firm’s Institutional Culture and Social Responsibility practice, working together with white collar colleagues to conduct culture assessments, internal investigations of executive misconduct, and civil rights and racial equity audits and assessments. Lindsay has been at the forefront of the changing workplace issues impacting employers in the U.S. in the last decade, including #MeToo, Covid-19, and the renewed focus on diversity, equity, and inclusion. She frequently advises employers in relation to their processes and procedures for investigating complaints of discrimination, harassment, and retaliation and trains executive teams and board members on culture risk and the lawful implementation of DEI programs.

Lindsay also guides employers through the process of hiring and terminating employees and managing their performance, including the drafting and review of employment agreements, restrictive covenant agreements, separation agreements, performance plans, and key employee policies and handbooks. She provides practical advice against the backdrop of the web of state and federal employment laws, such as Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Equal Pay Act, the Family and Medical Leave Act, the Fair Labor Standards Act, and the False Claims Act, with the objective of minimizing the risk of employee litigation. When litigation looms, Lindsay relies on her experience as an employment litigator to offer employers strategic advice and assistance in responding to demand letters and agency charges.

Lindsay works frequently with the firm’s privacy, employee benefits and executive compensation, corporate, government contracts, and cybersecurity practice groups to ensure that all potential employment issues are addressed in matters handled by these groups. She also regularly provides U.S. employment law training, support, and assistance to start-ups, non-profits, and foreign parent companies opening affiliates in the U.S.

Photo of Evan Parness Evan Parness

Evan represents employers and senior executives in non-compete, harassment, discrimination, retaliation, ERISA, and business tort litigation in state and federal courts, administrative agencies, and alternative dispute resolution bodies. He has secured significant trial and appellate victories for clients, including complete dismissals of discrimination…

Evan represents employers and senior executives in non-compete, harassment, discrimination, retaliation, ERISA, and business tort litigation in state and federal courts, administrative agencies, and alternative dispute resolution bodies. He has secured significant trial and appellate victories for clients, including complete dismissals of discrimination and retaliation lawsuits, successful verdicts following trial, and injunctive relief on behalf of clients enforcing restrictive covenants.

Evan also counsels established and emerging companies on compliance with federal, state, and local employment laws and regulations, and litigation avoidance measures in connection with all aspects of workplace employment issues. He conducts sensitive internal investigations of alleged discrimination and harassment, and assists employers in shaping workplace policies to comply with law and promote a productive working environment.

Evan advises leading companies on the labor and employment aspects of significant business transactions and acquisitions. He negotiates employment-related provisions in business transaction documents and oversees due diligence of a potential target’s employment practices. He also counsels clients on executive employment and restrictive covenants agreements.

Chambers USA notes “Evan is an exceptional and talented lawyer. He possesses a deep understanding of the law and an unwavering commitment to his clients. He has a keen eye for detail and can dissect complex legal issues with remarkable efficiency. His thorough and methodical approach to each case ensures that no stone is left unturned, providing his clients with the best possible legal representation.”

The Legal 500 US notes that clients have commented that “Evan Parness is an amazing attorney. Always attentive and will take instructions outside of business hours, he is always there when we need him and looks for the best outcome for clients.”

Photo of Carolyn Rashby Carolyn Rashby

Carolyn Rashby provides business-focused advice and counsel to companies navigating the constantly evolving and overlapping maze of federal, state, and local employment requirements. Carolyn’s approach is preventive, while recognizing the need to set clients up for the best possible defense should disputes arise.…

Carolyn Rashby provides business-focused advice and counsel to companies navigating the constantly evolving and overlapping maze of federal, state, and local employment requirements. Carolyn’s approach is preventive, while recognizing the need to set clients up for the best possible defense should disputes arise.

As a senior member of Covington’s Institutional Culture and Social Responsibility Practice Group, Carolyn has co-led significant investigations into workplace culture, DEI issues, and reports of sexual misconduct and workplace harassment.

As an employment lawyer with over two decades of experience, Carolyn focuses on a wide range of compliance and regulatory matters for employers, including:

  • Conducting audits regarding employee classification and pay equity
  • Advising on employment issues arising in corporate transactions
  • Strategic counseling on a wide range of issues including discrimination and harassment, wages and hours, worker classification, workplace accommodations and leave management, performance management and termination decisions, workplace violence, employment agreements, trade secrets, restrictive covenants, employee handbooks, and personnel policies
  • Drafting employment contracts and offer letters, separation agreements, NDAs, and other employment agreements
  • Advising on employee privacy matters, including under the California Consumer Privacy Act
  • Providing guidance on use of AI in the workplace and development of related policies
  • Leading anti-harassment and other workplace-related trainings, for employees, executives, and boards

Carolyn also works frequently with the firm’s white collar, privacy, employee benefits and executive compensation, corporate, government contracts, and cybersecurity practice groups to ensure that all potential employment issues are addressed in matters handled by these groups.

Photo of Nori Lu Nori Lu

Nori Lu focuses her practice on counseling clients on employment law compliance and risk mitigation. She advises companies on a broad range of employment-related matters, including personnel policies, employment contracts, workplace investigations, hiring, discipline, termination, and wage and hour compliance. She conducts employment-related…

Nori Lu focuses her practice on counseling clients on employment law compliance and risk mitigation. She advises companies on a broad range of employment-related matters, including personnel policies, employment contracts, workplace investigations, hiring, discipline, termination, and wage and hour compliance. She conducts employment-related diligence and advises on aspects of transactions involving the transfer and retention of personnel. She also has experience litigating claims related to employee restrictive covenants, trade secret misappropriation, wage and hour, discrimination, and retaliation.

Nori was previously a member of the firm’s corporate practice and has experience advising private and public companies in connection with venture capital financings, mergers and acquisitions, corporate governance matters, and commercial transactions.