Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Are We Still Fighting About Restrooms?

By Daniel Schwartz on November 26, 2024
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
bathroomforall
My visit to the Granville Island Market Restrooms

Last year, I visited Vancouver and got to go to Granville Island Public Market — one of the great markets in North America.

Sure, I could talk about the wonderful food I got there, but there was something else that felt very unique and downright modern — their restroom.

The bathroom had a sign — “All User Washroom – Everyone Welcome”. It noted that there were private stalls with private or shared sinks too.

And sure enough, when you walked in, it had exactly what was promised. There were people and kids using it side by side. The private stalls went down to the ground level and that was it.

It’s been almost a decade since I talked restroom access in the workplace on the blog because Connecticut now protects against gender identity and expression. Employers and people in Connecticut have adapted and moved on.

Schools have even followed guidance from the state Department of Education on restroom access.

And yet, this past year, we’ve still seen transgender rights raised during the election and worse, afterwards, one Representative in the House introduced a resolution that would ban transgender women on the House side of the Capitol from using restrooms that do not comport with the sex they were assigned at birth.

Putting aside the politics of it all, employers in Connecticut would be wise to ignore the rhetoric coming out of the capital on the issue.

Employers in Connecticut cannot discriminate on the basis of gender identity or expression. Requiring employees to use a restroom that comports with the sex they were assigned at birth is just asking for a claim.

(At the federal level, EEOC guidance on this topic was vacated by a 2022 District Court of Texas decision but it still provides helpful reasoning to employers in Connecticut where gender identity is explicitly protected by state law.)

Of course, there are various solutions to the “issue” including making single occupant restrooms available for all. But as the CBIA noted in a post a few years ago, employers would be wise to let the employee—not the employer—determine the most appropriate and safest option for himself or herself.

And a little bit of understanding never hurt either.

Photo of Daniel Schwartz Daniel Schwartz

Dan represents employers in various employment law matters such as employment discrimination, restrictive covenants, human resources, retaliation and whistle blowing, and wage and hour issues. He has extensive trial and litigation experience in both federal and state courts in a variety of areas…

Dan represents employers in various employment law matters such as employment discrimination, restrictive covenants, human resources, retaliation and whistle blowing, and wage and hour issues. He has extensive trial and litigation experience in both federal and state courts in a variety of areas, including commercial litigation and trade secret enforcement. Dan is the author of the independent Connecticut Employment Law Blog. The blog discusses new and noteworthy events in labor and employment law on a daily basis.

Read more about Daniel SchwartzEmailDaniel's Linkedin ProfileDaniel's Twitter Profile
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Other
  • Blog:
    Connecticut Employment Law Blog
  • Organization:
    Shipman & Goodwin LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo