Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherBrowse by ChannelAbout the NetworkJoin the NetworkProductsSub-MenuProducts OverviewBlog ProBlog PlusBlog PremierMicrositeSyndication PortalsAbout UsContactSubscribeSupport
Book a Demo
Search
Close

Ninth Circuit Court Holds Wastewater Rule Under the Clean Water Act Applies to the Entire Facility, Not Just to Portions Where Industrial Activities Occurred

By Glen C. Hansen, Simyllina Chen & Abbott & Kindermann, Inc. on January 2, 2025
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Puget Soundkeeper Alliance v. Port of Tacoma, 104 F.4th 95 (9th Cir. 2024).

Puget Soundkeeper Alliance (“Puget”) is an environmental organization concerned with water quality in Puget Sound. It brought a citizen suit under the Clean Water Act (“CWA”) against the Port of Tacoma, alleging that the Port had violated the Act in various respects. The marine cargo terminal contains a portion of the terminal where five large cranes load and unload container ships, commonly referred to as “the Wharf.” When rain falls on the terminal, stormwater runs into Puget Sound, carrying with it metals and other pollutants. The district court granted partial summary judgment to the Port, holding that the Industrial Stormwater General Permit (“ISGP”) does not extend coverage to the entire footprint of facilities but only to the parts “associated with industrial activity.” Because such activities do not occur at the Wharf, discharges from there do not require permits.

The Ninth Circuit vacated and reversed in part the district court’s partial summary judgment in favor of the Port and held that the plain text of the ISGPs required “a transportation facility conducting industrial activities implement stormwater controls across the entire facility.” Because the terminal was a facility conducting industrial activities, the permits extended CWA discharge requirements to all discharges from the whole facility, including the Wharf. The panel further reasoned that “the nature of the facility, not the nature of the discharge, determines whether there is coverage.”

Separately, the Port of Tacoma challenged the 2020 ISGP before the Washington State Pollution Control Hearings Board. The Washington Court of Appeals reviewed the board’s decision and issued a decision in accordance with the one from the Ninth Circuit. The port’s appeal is pending before the Washington Supreme Court.

Glen Hansen is Senior Counsel and Simyllina Chen is a Law Clerk at Abbott & Kindermann, Inc.  For questions relating to this article or any other California land use, real estate, environmental and/or planning issues contact Abbott & Kindermann, Inc. at (916) 456-9595.

The information presented in this article should not be construed to be formal legal advice by Abbott & Kindermann, Inc., or the formation of a lawyer/client relationship. Because of the changing nature of this area of the law and the importance of individual facts, readers are encouraged to seek independent counsel for advice regarding their individual legal issues.

Photo of Glen C. Hansen Glen C. Hansen

Glen C. Hansen is Senior Counsel at Abbott & Kindermann, Inc.  Mr. Hansen litigates disputes involving land use, real estate, constitutional takings, local government law and commercial transactions.  Mr. Hansen also advises clients on matters involving real property disputes, business law, environmental law…

Glen C. Hansen is Senior Counsel at Abbott & Kindermann, Inc.  Mr. Hansen litigates disputes involving land use, real estate, constitutional takings, local government law and commercial transactions.  Mr. Hansen also advises clients on matters involving real property disputes, business law, environmental law and local government matters. He often speaks at conferences and seminars on these issues.

Mr. Hansen served as the Chairman of the Real Property Section of the Sacramento County Bar Association and the Chairman of the Governmental Affairs Committee of the Elk Grove Chamber of Commerce. He is a member of the Executive Committee of the Environmental Section of the Sacramento County Bar Association, and serves on the Agribusiness Committee of the Business Law Section of the State Bar of California. He also serves as a Dispute Resolution Conference pro-tem judge for the El Dorado County Superior Court.

Practice Areas:

  • Land use and planning law
  • Real estate law
  • Local government law, including land use and planning
  • Constitutional takings
  • Commercial transactions

Education:

  • J.D., University of the Pacific, McGeorge School of Law, with distinction, 1993
  • B.A., Biola University, summa cum laude, 1986
Read more about Glen C. HansenEmailGlen's Linkedin Profile
Show more Show less
Photo of Abbott & Kindermann, Inc. Abbott & Kindermann, Inc.
Read more about Abbott & Kindermann, Inc.EmailJeaninne's Linkedin Profile
  • Posted in:
    Real Estate & Construction
  • Blog:
    Land Use Law Blog
  • Organization:
    Abbott & Kindermann, Inc.
  • Article: View Original Source

LexBlog, Inc. logo
Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
Real Lawyers
99 Park Row
  • About LexBlog
  • Careers
  • Press
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Privacy Policy
  • Editorial Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Service
  • RSS Terms of Service
  • Products
  • Blog Pro
  • Blog Plus
  • Blog Premier
  • Microsite
  • Syndication Portals
  • LexBlog Community
  • Resource Center
  • 1-800-913-0988
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
  • Resource Center
  • Blogging 101

New to the Network

  • Tennessee Insurance Litigation Blog
  • Claims & Sustains
  • New Jersey Restraining Order Lawyers
  • New Jersey Gun Lawyers
  • Blog of Reason
Copyright © 2025, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo