Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupport
Contact Us
Search
Close

California Legislature Moves to Set Integrity Parameters for Carbon Removal Credits

By Jennifer A. Smokelin, A.J. Wissinger & Nicholas Castriz on March 25, 2025
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
1742926882-3156717-3485-lxb_photo9O4irFy7h9wlxb_photo-
Simon Hermans, Unsplash

California lawmakers recently took a step towards regulating the integrity of carbon dioxide removal (CDR) strategies. If the law passes, it will impact carbon emissions reporting and compliance activities in California. Senate Bill 285 (SB 285), which is set for a hearing on April 2, 2025, aims to establish standards for CDR strategies to ensure scientific integrity in generating carbon removal credits. SB 285 addresses lawmakers’ concern that current laws lack clear definitions and durability requirements for CDRs. With clear definitions and legal requirements, SB 285 seeks to ensure that quality CDR strategies will be used to meet the state’s 2045 net-zero carbon dioxide target and align with corporate emissions reporting obligations under the California’s Climate Corporate Data Accountability Act (SB 253).  

Link to Key aspects of SB 285 include:  Key aspects of SB 285 include: 

  • Mandatory use of use of “qualified carbon dioxide removals” (i.e., qualified CDRs) for tracking progress against net-zero emission mandates and reporting offsets against corporate emission targets. SB 285 defines qualified CDRs to set integrity parameters for the CDRs that may be used for these purposes (e.g., the carbon removal process is not used for enhanced oil recovery).  
  • Adoption of a “like-for-like principle” that requires CDRs to match the timescale and durability of the emissions they offset. In short, this means that emissions from fossil fuels, for example, that were stored underground for millions of years must be matched with removals with similarly permanent forms of storage.   
  • Requirements for transparent emissions reporting and CDR use.

While SB 285 has not yet been signed into law, it demonstrates the focus the California Legislature continues to have on efforts to compel carbon reductions and reporting. We expect California to remain at the forefront of these types of ESG initiatives, particularly as federal initiatives are expected to wane under the new Trump administration.

test
Photo of Jennifer A. Smokelin Jennifer A. Smokelin
Read more about Jennifer A. SmokelinEmail
Photo of A.J. Wissinger A.J. Wissinger
Read more about A.J. WissingerEmail
Photo of Nicholas Castriz Nicholas Castriz
Email
  • Posted in:
    Environmental and Climate
  • Blog:
    EHS Law Insights
  • Organization:
    Reed Smith LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo