Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherBrowse by ChannelAbout the NetworkJoin the NetworkProductsSub-MenuProducts OverviewBlog ProBlog PlusBlog PremierMicrositeSyndication PortalsAbout UsContactSubscribeSupport
Book a Demo
Search
Close

Blockading the Ports: U.S. Imposes 10% Global Tariff; Higher Reciprocal Tariff Rates by Country

By Jordan Mallory, Reid Whitten, Lisa Mays, Curtis Dombek, J. Scott Maberry, Jonathan Wang & Marta Piñol Lindin on April 3, 2025
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Global-Trade-Blog-Global-Distribution-660x283

On April 2, President Trump issued an Executive Order (EO) imposing global reciprocal tariffs (White House Fact Sheet). The EO drew enough parallels to the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act that Trump mentioned it in his Rose Garden announcement. The EO imposes a 10% baseline tariff on all imports to the United States beginning April 3, 2025.

On top of that baseline, the EO also imposes country-by-country tariffs reciprocal tariffs represented in the chart below. Those amounts are based on what the United States Trade Representative (USTR) determined in its 2025 Foreign Trade Barriers report to be the current tariff rate imposed on U.S. goods for imports to that country. That rate includes official tariffs, as well currency manipulation and other “trade barriers.” The “kind” reciprocal tariffs for each country are roughly half of that amount.

Certain goods will not be subject to the reciprocal tariff. Those include the following:

  • Communications of no value, humanitarian donations, information materials and media, and personal luggage, subject to 50 USC 1702(b);
  • Steel/aluminum articles and autos/auto parts already subject to Section 232 tariffs;
  • Copper, pharmaceuticals, semiconductors, and lumber articles;
  • All articles that are or become subject to future Section 232 tariffs (e.g., steel, aluminum, autos and auto parts);
  • Bullion; and
  • Energy and other certain minerals that are not available in the United States.

For Mexico and Canada the existing tariffs imposed in March remain in effect. USMCA compliant goods will continue to see a 0% tariff, non-USMCA compliant goods will be subject to a 25% tariff, and non-USMCA compliant energy and potash will be subject to a 10% tariff. However, if the EO specific to Mexico and Canada were to be terminated, USMCA compliant goods would receive preferential treatment, and non-USMCA compliant goods would be subject to the 12% reciprocal tariff.

In addition to the universal tariff imposition, beginning on May 2, 2025, the 54% tariff rate on imports from China will also be applied to packages worth less than $800 coming to the United States from China or Hong Kong.

Because the new tariffs are imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), there does not appear to be a formal process for requesting a waiver to the tariffs or providing comments on their implementation. However, it is likely that actions will be filed in U.S. courts as well as before the World Trade Organization contesting the tariffs.

Photo of Jordan Mallory Jordan Mallory

Jordan Mallory is an associate in the Governmental Practice in the firm’s Washington, D.C. office.

Read more about Jordan MalloryEmail
Photo of Reid Whitten Reid Whitten

Reid is the Managing Partner of Sheppard Mullin’s London office, practicing in international trade regulations and investigations.

Read more about Reid WhittenEmail
Photo of Lisa Mays Lisa Mays

Lisa Mays is a partner in the Governmental Practice in the firm’s Orange County office. She is the Leader of the Supply Chain Management Team, and member of the Sanctions, Imports, and Export Controls Teams.

Read more about Lisa MaysEmail
Photo of Curtis Dombek Curtis Dombek

Curt Dombek is a partner in the Governmental Practice. Curt divides his time between the firm’s Brussels and Los Angeles offices.

Read more about Curtis DombekEmail
Photo of J. Scott Maberry J. Scott Maberry

Scott Maberry is an international trade partner in the Governmental Practice in the firm’s Washington, D.C. office.

Read more about J. Scott MaberryEmail
Photo of Jonathan Wang Jonathan Wang

Jonathan Wang is an associate in the Governmental Practice in the firm’s Washington D.C. office.

Read more about Jonathan WangEmail
Photo of Marta Piñol Lindin Marta Piñol Lindin

Marta Piñol Lindin is a Legal Consultant in the International Trade and Investment Law practice group in the firm’s Brussels office.

Read more about Marta Piñol LindinEmail
  • Posted in:
    Corporate & Commercial, International
  • Blog:
    Global Trade Law Blog
  • Organization:
    Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

LexBlog, Inc. logo
Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
Real Lawyers
99 Park Row
  • About LexBlog
  • Careers
  • Press
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Privacy Policy
  • Editorial Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Service
  • RSS Terms of Service
  • Products
  • Blog Pro
  • Blog Plus
  • Blog Premier
  • Microsite
  • Syndication Portals
  • LexBlog Community
  • Resource Center
  • 1-800-913-0988
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
  • Resource Center
  • Blogging 101

New to the Network

  • Tennessee Insurance Litigation Blog
  • Claims & Sustains
  • New Jersey Restraining Order Lawyers
  • New Jersey Gun Lawyers
  • Blog of Reason
Copyright © 2025, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo