Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherBrowse by ChannelAbout the NetworkJoin the NetworkProductsSub-MenuProducts OverviewBlog ProBlog PlusBlog PremierMicrositeSyndication PortalsAbout UsContactSubscribeSupport
Book a Demo
Search
Close

State-Level E-Verify Proposals Signal Shift in Employment Compliance Landscape

By Miriam C. Thompson on April 11, 2025
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
shutterstock_525426433

A growing number of states are considering legislation that would require more employers to use E-Verify, the federal system used to confirm that new hires are authorized to work in the United States. These proposals suggest a broader trend toward increased immigration-related employment compliance and may impact how businesses manage their hiring practices, particularly in sectors with large immigrant workforces.

Expanding E-Verify Requirements

In 2025, legislators in over a dozen states have introduced or advanced bills that would expand the use of E-Verify. Some states, such as Idaho, Indiana, Kansas, Montana, and Texas, are exploring new mandates that would apply to all employers. Others are building on existing laws by lowering employer size thresholds or increasing penalties for noncompliance.

For example, Florida currently requires private employers with 25 or more employees performing services in Florida to use E-Verify. New proposals in the state would extend the requirement to all employers, apply verification obligations to independent contractors, and propose higher fines and the potential revocation of business licenses for violations.1

Impact on Employers

These proposals are particularly relevant for industries that rely on a significant number of foreign-born workers, such as agriculture, hospitality, construction, and healthcare. In several states, representatives from these sectors have raised concerns about the operational challenges associated with mandatory E-Verify use.

While E-Verify is currently mandatory only in a few states, it remains optional at the federal level for most private-sector employers, with certain exceptions, including but not limited to, employers with federal contracts. However, national policy discussions continue, with some lawmakers advocating for a broader federal mandate.

Federal Developments

The push for expanded E-Verify use is occurring alongside other immigration enforcement efforts, including worksite inspections and proposed changes to immigration programs that could affect work authorization for certain populations. A federal E-Verify mandate was previously included in immigration legislation, but it did not advance. Nonetheless, similar proposals continue to be introduced, with the most recent federal bill being introduced last month.

Employers may face additional uncertainty as state and federal discussions unfold, particularly where there are delays in visa processing or changes to Temporary Protected Status (TPS) and other programs affecting employment eligibility.

Considerations for Employers

Given the evolving landscape, employers should consider:

  • Reviewing Form I-9 procedures to enhance accurate and compliant employment eligibility verification practices.
  • Evaluating E-Verify enrollment and usage processes, especially in states where legislation is pending or likely.
  • Training HR and compliance personnel on the potential changes and how they may affect onboarding and recordkeeping.
  • Monitoring legislative activity in states where their organizations operate or have a significant workforce.
  • Implementing workforce planning strategies, including alternative hiring or mobility options, where appropriate.

As state-level E-Verify proposals continue to emerge, employers are encouraged to stay informed and prepare for the possibility of new compliance obligations. Early preparation may help minimize disruption and ensure alignment with both state and federal employment verification requirements.


1 See SB 782.; See HB 1033.  

Photo of Miriam C. Thompson Miriam C. Thompson

Miriam C. Thompson focuses her practice on business immigration and immigration-related compliance issues. Miriam assists employers with hiring and retaining foreign nationals in various industries and business sectors, including manufacturing, engineering, technology, medical, logistics, and academia. She has experience advising employers on all…

Miriam C. Thompson focuses her practice on business immigration and immigration-related compliance issues. Miriam assists employers with hiring and retaining foreign nationals in various industries and business sectors, including manufacturing, engineering, technology, medical, logistics, and academia. She has experience advising employers on all aspects of business immigration, including nonimmigrant visa categories (B, E, F-1, H-1B, J-1, L-1 A/B, O-1, TN), managing a multinational workforce, and permanent residence.

Miriam lived, studied, and worked in Germany, Switzerland, and France. Her native language is German and she is conversational in French.

Read more about Miriam C. ThompsonEmailMiriam C.'s Linkedin Profile
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Immigration
  • Blog:
    Inside Business Immigration
  • Organization:
    Greenberg Traurig, LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

LexBlog, Inc. logo
Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
Real Lawyers
99 Park Row
  • About LexBlog
  • Careers
  • Press
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Privacy Policy
  • Editorial Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Service
  • RSS Terms of Service
  • Products
  • Blog Pro
  • Blog Plus
  • Blog Premier
  • Microsite
  • Syndication Portals
  • LexBlog Community
  • Resource Center
  • 1-800-913-0988
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
  • Resource Center
  • Blogging 101

New to the Network

  • Beyond the First 100 Days
  • In the Legal Interest
  • Cooking with SALT
  • The Fiduciary Litigator
  • CCN Mexico Report™
Copyright © 2025, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo