Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

California Privacy Regulator Moves to Finalize Long-Awaited CCPA Regulations

By Sherry Xiaoxuan Ding, Darren Abernethy & Gretchen A. Ramos on July 26, 2025
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
CCPA concept_ a white computer keyword with a lock, a California shape and the text California consumer privacy act=Shutterstock_1590884833

Table of Contents

  • The CPPA Advanced the Proposed Regulations on ADMT, Risk Assessments, Cybersecurity Audits for OAL Approval
  • DROP Rulemaking: Modifications and Second Comment Round
  • Budget Update: Growing Operations, Uncertain Enforcement Funding
  • Legislation: Supportive Measures with Potential Business Impact

The California Privacy Protection Agency (CPPA) Board met on July 24, 2025, and advanced several key initiatives with direct implications for businesses operating in California.

The meeting focused on finalizing regulations pertaining to automated decision-making, risk assessments, and cybersecurity audits; advancing the California Delete Act’s Delete Request and Opt-Out Platform (DROP) rulemaking applicable to data brokers; and reviewing budget and legislative updates.

With enforcement capacity continuing to grow, and in increase in 2025 in CCPA and Delete Act enforcement settlements, businesses should be preparing for more structured compliance expectations in 2026 and beyond.

Link to The CPPA Advanced the Proposed Regulations on ADMT, Risk Assessments, Cybersecurity Audits for OAL Approval The CPPA Advanced the Proposed Regulations on ADMT, Risk Assessments, Cybersecurity Audits for OAL Approval

The CPPA confirmed that it will move forward with the current version of its proposed regulations on automated decision-making technology (ADMT), privacy risk assessments, and cybersecurity audits, without further revisions following the most recent public comment period. The 24-day comment window — which exceeded the required 15 days — generated over 575 pages of submissions from 70 commenters, including labor advocates, consumer groups, and industry stakeholders.

After review, staff concluded that no further changes were warranted and that the existing draft “strikes an appropriate balance” between privacy protections and business needs. The public comments were sharply divided.

Labor and consumer advocacy groups criticized the regulations as a significant retreat from protecting workers and consumers and negatively impacting employment and worker’s rights.

In stark contrast, technology industry representatives argued that the regulations were overly broad and could harm California’s innovation economy.

Some industry group (such as healthcare and banking) representatives argued that the proposed regulations create unnecessary burdens for their federally regulated sectors and could potentially interfere with existing oversight mechanisms.

Additionally, multiple rideshare drivers provided personal testimonials about how automated decision-making technologies negatively impact their work through arbitrary deactivations and opaque performance evaluations. 

The full regulatory package will be submitted to the Office of Administrative Law (OAL), which has 30 business days to issue its determination. If approved, the regulations will become enforceable immediately (although in practice some, such as the cybersecurity audits, would technically not need to be completed until 2028) and form the basis for future compliance expectations in California, unless further court decisions intervene the enforcement date.

While not the focus of this meeting, the final version of the regulations incorporates changes made during earlier comment rounds, including:

  • Phasing in the cybersecurity audit obligations based on a business’s gross annual revenue over a three-year period to reduce the immediate burden on smaller companies – meaning that businesses with more than $100M annual gross revenue (based on 2026) would start the audits first, while those in the $50M-$100M range and those below $50M would have an additional two years and one year, respectively, before the cybersecurity audit requirements kick in;
  • Removing the behavioral advertising threshold that would have triggered ADMT requirements;
  • Narrowing the definition of ADMT to encompass technology that replaces or substantially replaces human decision-making – excluding technology that merely executes a decision or substantially facilitates human decision-making; and
  • Narrowing the scope of ADMT rules to apply only when used in “significant decisions” – i.e., those that result in provision or denial of financial or lending, housing, education enrollment or opportunities, employment or independent contracting opportunities or compensation, or healthcare services. 

Link to DROP Rulemaking: Modifications and Second Comment Round DROP Rulemaking: Modifications and Second Comment Round

The CPPA Board also advanced revisions to its proposed DROP regulations, which operationalize the Delete Act’s centralized opt-out and deletion mechanism that must be utilized by data brokers. Following a 45-day comment period in March 2025, the agency proposed updates and approved releasing them for an additional 15-day public comment period. Key changes include:

  • Suppression List Requirements: Clarified authorization to retain limited consumer data for record-matching and to share suppression data with contractors.
  • Residency Verification: CPPA will confirm California residency before processing deletion requests to data brokers.
  • Data Standardization Requirements: Adjustments made to enable handling of multiple identifiers, improve partial match functionality, and refine consent standards.

The agency reiterated its goal of having final regulations in place and effective by January 1, 2026. The staff also addressed Board questions about matching complexity and the use of hashed data to improve system reliability.

Link to Budget Update: Growing Operations, Uncertain Enforcement Funding Budget Update: Growing Operations, Uncertain Enforcement Funding

The CPPA currently has 43 permanent staff across 53 authorized positions, with a growing emphasis on bringing enforcement, legal, and procurement capabilities in-house. However, staff flagged an ongoing concern: enforcement funds are not guaranteed or consistent year-over-year, potentially complicating long-term planning for investigations and compliance oversight.

By contrast, funds tied to the Data Broker Registry are statutorily earmarked for building and maintaining the DROP system. This distinction may signal the agency’s continued enforcement activities, and to ramp up enforcement as regulatory obligations expand after the Proposed Regulations on ADMT, Risk Assessments, Cybersecurity Audits becomes effective.

Link to Legislation: Supportive Measures with Potential Business Impact Legislation: Supportive Measures with Potential Business Impact

The CPPA reviewed and took positions on several privacy-related bills, including

  • AB 322 – Restricts collection and sale of precise geolocation data. Agency Position: Support.
  • AB 566 – “California Opt Me Out Act,” requiring browsers to enable global privacy control signals. Agency Position: Support.
  • AB 302 – Requires CPPA to maintain lists of elected officials and judges for special deletion handling. Agency Position: Support if amended, citing feasibility and verification concerns.
Photo of Sherry Xiaoxuan Ding Sherry Xiaoxuan Ding

Sherry Xiaoxuan Ding is a member of the Data Privacy & Cybersecurity Practice in Greenberg Traurig’s San Francisco office. Sherry advises clients with creative strategies in addressing cross-border privacy and data security compliance issues under regulatory regimes in EU, U.S., and APAC regions…

Sherry Xiaoxuan Ding is a member of the Data Privacy & Cybersecurity Practice in Greenberg Traurig’s San Francisco office. Sherry advises clients with creative strategies in addressing cross-border privacy and data security compliance issues under regulatory regimes in EU, U.S., and APAC regions, with a focus on international data transfer.

Read more about Sherry Xiaoxuan DingEmailSherry's Linkedin Profile
Show more Show less
Photo of Darren Abernethy Darren Abernethy

Darren J. Abernethy is an ad tech, data privacy and cybersecurity attorney with more than a decade of experience, including in Am Law private practice in Washington, D.C. and as in-house counsel at startups and a leading privacy technology vendor. He advises clients

…

Darren J. Abernethy is an ad tech, data privacy and cybersecurity attorney with more than a decade of experience, including in Am Law private practice in Washington, D.C. and as in-house counsel at startups and a leading privacy technology vendor. He advises clients on matters related to digital advertising, privacy law compliance, data breach management, M&A, and FTC best practices.

Darren’s concentrations include data-driven marketing campaigns, the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) and other U.S. state privacy laws, the European Union General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)/ePrivacy, direct marketing, and IP-related transactional matters.

Read more about Darren AbernethyEmailDarren's Linkedin Profile
Show more Show less
Photo of Gretchen A. Ramos Gretchen A. Ramos

Gretchen A. Ramos is Global Co-Chair of the Data, Privacy & Cybersecurity Practice. Gretchen is a creative problem-solver that various large tech clients rely on to handle their most challenging data protection issues. Clients appreciate not only her legal skills, but also her

…

Gretchen A. Ramos is Global Co-Chair of the Data, Privacy & Cybersecurity Practice. Gretchen is a creative problem-solver that various large tech clients rely on to handle their most challenging data protection issues. Clients appreciate not only her legal skills, but also her direct, no-nonsense approach in providing advice. She works closely with her clients to manage data and leverage its value in ways to meet compliance obligations, as well as deliver value to the business and instill consumer trust.

Read more about Gretchen A. RamosEmailGretchen A.'s Linkedin Profile
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Privacy and Cybersecurity
  • Blog:
    Data Privacy Dish
  • Organization:
    Greenberg Traurig, LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo