Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

USCIS Policy Manual Update: Discretionary Factors in Immigration Benefits

By Natalie Gorelishvili on August 20, 2025
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
shutterstock_1023329377

On Aug. 19, 2025, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) updated its policy manual to provide guidance on how USCIS officers should exercise discretion when reviewing immigration benefit requests. Specifically, the guidance clarifies that USCIS officers will carefully consider an applicant’s entire immigration record and weigh both positive and negative factors before making a decision on whether to grant an immigration benefit. This update specifically emphasizes considerations related to any involvement in anti-American or terrorist organizations, past requests for parole, and antisemitic activity.

The updated policy also provides guidance on how USCIS officers should exercise discretion when adjudicating EB-5 investor petitions in cases involving threats to national interest, fraud, deceit, misrepresentation, and criminal misuse.

Link to Key Highlights: Key Highlights:

  • Negative Discretionary Factors: USCIS will assign “overwhelmingly” negative weight to any past conduct supporting terrorist organizations, promoting anti-American ideologies, and endorsing antisemitic terrorism or related ideologies.
  • Anti-American Activity: USCIS has expanded social media vetting to include reviews for anti-American activity. Any support, promotion, or endorsement of anti-American ideologies or organizations will be considered an overwhelmingly negative factor.
  • Association with Terrorist or Antisemitic Groups: Any involvement with or support for terrorist organizations, antisemitic terrorism, or related ideologies will have significant negative impact.
  • Past Parole History: USCIS will consider whether prior parole requests were made in good faith and in compliance with applicable laws and policies in effect at the time.  
  • EB-5 Investor Petitions: USCIS specifically noted that it will apply discretion in cases involving threats to national interest, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation, and criminal misuse. This will apply to both standalone and regional center investor petitions.

The new guidance is effective immediately and applies to all cases pending or filed on or after Aug. 19, 2025, and supersedes any related prior guidance.

For more detailed information, please refer to USCIS policy alert.

Photo of Natalie Gorelishvili Natalie Gorelishvili

Natalie Gorelishvili focuses her practice on U.S. business immigration and compliance matters. She represents clients across a variety of industries in a wide range of employment-based immigrant and nonimmigrant visa matters, including PERM Labor Certification applications, EB-1, EB-2, EB-3, H-1B, J-1, E-2, E-3…

Natalie Gorelishvili focuses her practice on U.S. business immigration and compliance matters. She represents clients across a variety of industries in a wide range of employment-based immigrant and nonimmigrant visa matters, including PERM Labor Certification applications, EB-1, EB-2, EB-3, H-1B, J-1, E-2, E-3, L-1, O-1 and TN. Natalie has experience providing clients and their employees with creative legal solutions on complex immigration matters and responding to complex Requests for Evidence.

Read more about Natalie GorelishviliEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Immigration
  • Blog:
    Inside Business Immigration
  • Organization:
    Greenberg Traurig, LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo