Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Back to the Exemptions? Possible Changes to Home Health and Personal Care Worker Wage Regulations

By Lily Rucker Othmer & Anne R. Yuengert on August 27, 2025
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Back to the Exemptions? Possible Changes to Home Health and Personal Care Worker Wage Regulations

Table of Contents

  • History of Statutory Exemptions Under the FLSA and Chevron Deference
  • July 2025 Developments
  • How Can Home Care Provider Employers Prepare?

Are home health and personal care workers eligible for overtime? That is a more complicated question than it first appears. In fact, it could be about to change again as certain providers of home health and personal care workers face a major shift as the U.S. Department of Labor’s (DOL) Wage and Hour Division (WHD) moves to restore certain long‑standing exemptions under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). As a result, providers of home health and personal care workers should prepare for the impact of this significant policy reversal on employees and the company.

Link to History of Statutory Exemptions Under the FLSA and Chevron Deference History of Statutory Exemptions Under the FLSA and Chevron Deference

In 1974, Congress amended the FLSA to extend coverage to all domestic service workers, simultaneously carving out two key exceptions:

  • A complete exemption from minimum wage and overtime for “any employee employed in domestic service employment to provide companionship services for individuals who (because of age or infirmity) are unable to care for themselves” (the Companionship Exemption); and
  • An exemption from the FLSA’s overtime requirements for “any employee who is employed in domestic service in a household and who resides in such household” (the Live‑In Exemption).

The result was that workers who fell into the Companionship Exemption could be paid less than minimum wage, and workers in either exemption were not eligible for overtime. Congress authorized and instructed the DOL to define the terms “companionship services” and “domestic service employment,” leading to the DOL’s 1975 regulations. Under the 1975 regulations, third‑party employers (such as home care or staffing agencies) were eligible to claim both the Companionship and Live‑In Exemptions.

Almost 40 years later, in 2013, the DOL published a final rule that revised and dramatically narrowed the Companionship and Live‑In Exemptions (the 2013 Rule). Among other things, the 2013 Rule:

  • Precluded third‑party employers from claiming either the Companionship or Live‑In Exemptions; and
  • Narrowed the definition of “companionship services,” capping “care” duties at 20% of total hours worked for exempt employees.

The 2013 Rule forced most home health and personal care providers to begin paying minimum wage and overtime for workers who were previously exempt. Not surprisingly, there was some litigation filed but the DOL prevailed and, in 2015, started enforcing the 2013 Rule. Imperatively, in upholding the 2013 Rule, the courts granted deference to the DOL’s interpretation under the analytical framework set forth in Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. (As you may recall, in 2024, the Supreme Court overruled the long-standing Chevron doctrine via its Loper Bright opinion.)

The drastic shift in the DOL’s regulations caught numerous home health and personal care provider companies off guard, prompting a wave of investigations and fines that resulted in unprepared employers paying millions of dollars in backpay. The overtime requirements of the 2013 Rule also created reimbursement gaps for companies that serviced families on government-funded health insurance.

Link to July 2025 Developments July 2025 Developments

On July 2, 2025, the DOL issued a proposed rule that would restore the pre‑2013 Companionship and Live‑In Exemption frameworks. The proposed rule relies on Loper Bright and seeks comments as to whether its pre-2013 interpretation with respect to third-party employers is a “better reading of the FLSA’s statutory text.” Public comments are due to the DOL by September 2, 2025.

On July 25, 2025, the WHD published Field Assistance Bulletin (FAB) No. 2025‑4, announcing that it will “immediately discontinue enforcement” of the 2013 Rule, “including open cases.” Among other things, FAB No. 2025‑4 also instructed that WHD investigators cannot investigate or take any enforcement actions against third‑party employers, including home care agencies, that rely on the Companionship or Live‑In Exemptions.

Link to How Can Home Care Provider Employers Prepare? How Can Home Care Provider Employers Prepare?

In light of FAB No. 2025‑4 and the pending final rule, home care agencies have a critical window to prepare for the restored Companionship and Live‑In Exemptions:

  • Review current classifications and pay practices for all employees and identify who might be exempt under the new rule.
  • Track the DOL’s notice-and-comment process, as a final rule may shift the landscape again.
  • Stay informed on state-level wage and hour laws that may differ from federal exemptions.
Photo of Lily Rucker Othmer Lily Rucker Othmer

Lily Rucker Othmer is an associate in the firm’s Labor & Employment Practice Group.

Read more about Lily Rucker OthmerEmailLily's Linkedin Profile
Photo of Anne R. Yuengert Anne R. Yuengert

Anne Yuengert works with clients to manage their employees, including conducting workplace investigations of harassment or theft, training employees and supervisors, consulting on reductions in force and severance agreements, drafting employment agreements (including enforceable noncompetes) and handbooks, assessing reasonable accommodations for disabilities, and…

Anne Yuengert works with clients to manage their employees, including conducting workplace investigations of harassment or theft, training employees and supervisors, consulting on reductions in force and severance agreements, drafting employment agreements (including enforceable noncompetes) and handbooks, assessing reasonable accommodations for disabilities, and working through issues surrounding FMLA and USERRA leave. When preventive measures are not enough, she handles EEOC charges, OFCCP and DOL complaints and investigations, and has handled cases before arbitrators, administrative law judges and federal and state court judges. She has tried more than 30 cases to verdict.

Read more about Anne R. YuengertEmailAnne's Linkedin Profile
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Employment & Labor
  • Blog:
    Labor & Employment Insights
  • Organization:
    Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo