Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupport
Contact Us
Search
Close

No Monetary Harm, No Foul?  Not Quite, but American Airlines Not Required to Pay Any Monetary Damages in ERISA ESG Breach of Loyalty Case

By Mary Grace Richardson & Adam Scoll on October 3, 2025
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
American Airlines Airbus A319-115
Forsaken Films, Unsplash

On September 30, 2025, Judge Reed O’Connor of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas issued a final judgment on damages in Spence v. American Airlines, Inc., No. 4:23-cv-552 (N.D. Tex. Sept. 30, 2025), which related to challenges that American Airlines and its employee benefits committee (“AA”) violated their ERISA fiduciary duties by allowing their corporate environmental, social and governance (“ESG”) interests, as well as the Plan’s investment manager’s (the “IM”) ESG interests, to influence management of certain AA retirement plans (the “Plan”). In January this year, Judge O’Connor ruled that AA failed to act solely in the Plan’s best financial interests and therefore breached their duty of loyalty, but since AA acted in accordance with prevailing industry practices, AA did not also breach their duty of prudence (that ruling is discussed in more detail here). Following the January ruling, the Court was left to determine the appropriate remedy for the breach.

Judge O’Connor concluded that AA did not owe monetary damages for the breach of the duty of loyalty because the plaintiff failed to sufficiently establish actual financial losses to the Plan as a result of the breach. Rather, the court granted significant equitable relief, including permanently enjoining AA as follows:

  • AA may not permit any proxy voting, shareholder proposals or other stewardship activities on behalf of the Plan that are motivated by or directed towards non-pecuniary ends (including ESG-oriented investment management and objectives) that are not in the exclusive best financial interests of the Plan;
  • For 5 years, AA must hire and appoint at least two members to its employee benefits committee that are completely independent and unrelated to any Plan investment manager (including the IM);
  • AA must provide additional reports and certifications regarding compliance with their ERISA duty of loyalty to Plan participants on an annual basis;
  • AA is required to publish on its corporate website information concerning AA’s membership in initiatives or organizations principally devoted to achieving DEI, ESG, climate-focused or stewardship objectives; and
  • AA may not use the IM or any other asset manager that owns 3% or more of American Airline’s shares or holds any of its fixed debt to manage Plan assets without policies in place to prevent those that maintain a corporate relationship with the asset manager from also being a Plan fiduciary or otherwise involved in Plan management.

Although this case is somewhat unique in finding a breach of duty of loyalty but not prudence, it serves as a reminder to Plan fiduciaries that, even where no monetary damages are awarded, a court can still award significant equitable relief to remedy a breach of ERISA fiduciary duty. 

Photo of Mary Grace Richardson Mary Grace Richardson

Mary Grace Richardson is an associate in the Labor & Employment Department and a member of the Employee Benefits & Executive Compensation Group.

In the employee benefits area, Mary Grace’s practice focuses on an array of tax and benefits issues impacting both multiemployer…

Mary Grace Richardson is an associate in the Labor & Employment Department and a member of the Employee Benefits & Executive Compensation Group.

In the employee benefits area, Mary Grace’s practice focuses on an array of tax and benefits issues impacting both multiemployer and single-employer benefit plans and plan fiduciaries. She assists clients on matters pertaining to plan administration, design and qualification, as well as regulatory, legislative and legal compliance.

Prior to joining Proskauer, Mary Grace clerked for Chief Judge S. Maurice Hicks, Jr. in the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana.

Mary Grace received her J.D. and diploma in comparative law, magna cum laude, from Louisiana State University Paul M. Hebert Law School. At LSU, she served as a senior editor of the Louisiana Law Review and was a member of the Order of the Coif.

Read more about Mary Grace RichardsonEmail
Show more Show less
Photo of Adam Scoll Adam Scoll

Adam Scoll is a partner in the Firm’s Tax Department and Private Funds Group.

He specializes in the area of Title I of ERISA and the investment of ERISA “plan assets,” advising both pension trusts and their investment managers and advisers with regard…

Adam Scoll is a partner in the Firm’s Tax Department and Private Funds Group.

He specializes in the area of Title I of ERISA and the investment of ERISA “plan assets,” advising both pension trusts and their investment managers and advisers with regard to compliance with ERISA’s complex fiduciary duty and prohibited transaction rules.

Adam regularly advises private investment fund sponsors regarding the structuring of their funds in order to accept investments from ERISA-covered pension trusts, including compliance with the ERISA “plan asset” regulations and the operation of venture capital operating companies (VCOCs) and real estate operating companies (REOCs).

Read more about Adam ScollEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Employment & Labor
  • Blog:
    Compensation & Benefits Blog
  • Organization:
    Proskauer Rose LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo