Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupport
Contact Us
Search
Close

Ohio Walks Back Prior Small Loan Act Guidance, Eases Licensing Position for Bank Partnerships

By Ian Brown, Francis L. Doorley & Eric T. Mitzenmacher on November 9, 2025
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Around Christmas 2024, the Ohio Division of Financial Institutions (“DFI”) left a lump of coal in marketplace consumer lenders’ proverbial stockings by issuing guidance that asserted a license under the Ohio Small Loan Act (“SLA”) was required to arrange consumer loans of $5,000 or less in exchange for compensation—even if those loans were issued by federally insured banks pursuant to their authority under federal banking law. Expanded guidance and FAQs issued in January 2025 further supported DFI’s position that a license would be required for many parties engaged in arranging or brokering Ohio loans. Combined, the issuances left some market participants—particularly those operating under bank partnership models—scrambling to determine whether their programs were subject to the SLA under the DFI’s new position, whether to apply for a license, and whether obtaining a license would then impose material substantive limitations on affected lending programs.

In a positive development for consumer lending platforms (among other industry participants), the DFI appears to have withdrawn the 2024 guidance, albeit subject to the regulator’s ongoing consideration of underlying issues.

As of October 31, 2025, the DFI has updated its guidance on the application of the SLA to bank partnerships, reversing course from its earlier interpretation of the statute. The updated guidance states that the DFI will not require any non-bank entity that is compensated for arranging bank loans in any amount to obtain a license under the SLA or to otherwise engage in such activity.  Critically, the guidance also provides that the DFI does not intend to pursue enforcement action against any entity for engaging in such activity in calendar year 2025 without a valid license (whether or not such entity pursued a license application following the December 2024 and January 2025 guidance issuances).

With respect to licensing requirements, the updated guidance also states that the DFI will not require any entity that makes or arranges loans of $5,000 or less, but does not charge interest, to obtain a license under the SLA to engage in this activity. By statute, the licensing obligation continues to apply to any non-exempt entity that engages in the business of lending money in amounts of $5,000 or less or contracts for or receives, directly or indirectly in connection with such loans, “interest and charges that in the aggregate are greater than the interest and charges that the lender would be permitted to charge … if the lender were not a licensee” (typically an 8% annualized rate for consumer loans in the state unless alternative interest rate authority exists).

Beyond addressing the basic requirement to obtain a license, the updated guidance also states that the DFI will not enforce or seek to apply Section 1321.141 of the Ohio Revised Code against any entity engaging in activity that, as a result of the updated guidance, is not subject to licensure. That section of the Code prohibits SLA licensees from (i) making loans of $1,000 or less or a duration of one year or less or (ii) engaging in any act or practice to evade this prohibition, including by assisting a borrower to obtain a loan on terms that would be prohibited. It had been a material point of contention for lending platforms operating through bank partnerships where the originating bank was not subject to a loan duration limitation itself, but application of substantive requirements under Ohio’s licensing regime when a non-bank platform was involved in loan arrangement or brokerage could have resulted in indirect application of such a restriction.

The recent update is a welcome departure from the guidance it previously issued. Consistent with past updates, the DFI did not provide explanation for its updated guidance aside from stating that it had continued to engage with the industry and monitor ongoing developments. The new release suggests that a détente of sorts may have been reached for now, though further monitoring of the situation may be warranted as the DFI continues to engage on bank partnership issues. 

Photo of Francis L. Doorley Francis L. Doorley

Frank Doorley is a partner in Mayer Brown’s Washington DC office and a member of the Financial Services Regulatory & Enforcement group. He handles a broad range of federal and state regulatory compliance matters, primarily for consumer financial product and service providers.  Frank…

Frank Doorley is a partner in Mayer Brown’s Washington DC office and a member of the Financial Services Regulatory & Enforcement group. He handles a broad range of federal and state regulatory compliance matters, primarily for consumer financial product and service providers.  Frank has significant experience advising lenders, consumer finance providers, and investors on compliance obligations under federal and state law. His experience covers a range of products and program structures, including Fintech and marketplace lending programs, retail and home improvement financing, general-purpose unsecured credit, and small business lending and alternative financing. He regularly provides guidance on federal consumer financial laws such as the Truth in Lending Act (TILA), Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA) and the CFPB Mortgage Servicing Rules, Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA), Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA), Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA), Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (SCRA) and prohibitions on unfair, deceptive, and abusive acts and practices (UDAAP).

Read Frank’s full bio.

Read more about Francis L. DoorleyEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Banking, Finance and Securities
  • Blog:
    Consumer Financial Services Review
  • Organization:
    Mayer Brown
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo