Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

2025 IP Update and Year in Review: Navigating Right to Repair and What It Means for Brands in a Changing Aftermarket

By Jennifer Fraser & Michael Word on January 5, 2026
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Acme Parts

Table of Contents

  • Trademark Protection
  • Patent Protection
  • Practical Takeaways

Right to repair laws are giving consumers and independent repair shops greater access to parts and information. While these laws benefit consumers, they also create challenges for original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) and authorized suppliers, raising concerns about safety, privacy, and security. Intellectual property (IP) laws offer companies tools to protect their aftermarket business and maintain brand integrity.

Link to Trademark Protection Trademark Protection

Trademarks help companies prevent consumer confusion about the source or quality of parts and services. Nominative fair use allows limited use of another company’s trademark for identification (for example, “we repair Acme products”), but misuse is common. Companies must avoid logos, colors, or prominent displays that suggest authorization. Issues often arise when former distributors continue to promote their authorized status with outdated signage or websites. Brand owners have a duty to monitor and address these uses. Failure to do so can weaken a brand’s unique identity and, in extreme cases, risk trademarks becoming generic, as happened with Escalator and Thermos.

Link to Patent Protection Patent Protection

Patents provide another avenue to protect aftermarket products. Unlike copyright laws, federal patent rights are not limited by state right to repair laws, making them a reliable tool for safeguarding parts and services. Design patents can cover exterior components as well as the fit and placement of internal parts. Properly marking parts with patent numbers can deter copycats and reinforce legal protections.

Link to Practical Takeaways Practical Takeaways

For practical tips and concrete steps to stay ahead of emerging challenges, see the full commentary on pages 13–14 of Dykema’s 2025 IP Update and Year in Review.

Photo of Jennifer Fraser Jennifer Fraser

Leader of the firm’s trademark practice, Jennifer is a widely respected intellectual property practitioner who brings her experience and talents to representing clients in various sectors, including chemical, industrial, consumer products, financial, cybersecurity, software, and medical, among others.

Read more about Jennifer FraserEmail
Photo of Michael Word Michael Word

Mike Word represents some of the world’s leading technology companies, as both plaintiffs and defendants, in matters before the U.S. federal district courts, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, the International Trade Commission (ITC), the Patent Trials and Appeals Board…

Mike Word represents some of the world’s leading technology companies, as both plaintiffs and defendants, in matters before the U.S. federal district courts, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, the International Trade Commission (ITC), the Patent Trials and Appeals Board (PTAB), and before American Arbitration Association (AAA) panels. In addition, he serves as the co-leader of Dykema’s Artificial Intelligence and Innovation Group.

Read more about Michael WordEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Intellectual Property
  • Blog:
    The Open Road Automotive Law Blog
  • Organization:
    Dykema
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo