Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Litigation is a strategy, not a reflex

By Jonathan Hyman on March 3, 2026
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

When an employee walks out the door holding your company’s stuff hostage, you have two problems: (1) your property, and (2) the story you’re creating for the inevitable lawsuit.

Rezene v. Haribo is a case study in how fast this can go sideways. The employee allegedly kept a company Mercedes, phone, laptop, and other items while severance talks dragged on. The employer’s lawyers got involved to retrieve the property. After multiple written demands, they contacted police. Officers showed up at the employee’s home. Cue the next act: claims for defamation, emotional distress, discrimination, and retalation.

Years of federal litigation followed. Haribo ultimately won. Some claims died on summary judgment. The rest died at trial. But that’s not the point.

What started as a property-return dispute metastasized into 15 rounds of litigation. Depositions. Summary judgment briefing. A jury trial. And who knows how many hundreds of thousands of dollars in legal fees.

Winning doesn’t mean it was cheap. Or fast. Or worth it.

Employers, property recovery is not just an IT/HR chore. It’s evidence management. Every email, every deadline, every adjective becomes a future exhibit.

So what’s the right playbook?

1) Separate the issues. Severance discussions are one lane. Property return is another. Put it in writing: return of company property is required regardless of whether we reach a severance agreement.

2) Make the demand letter boring. List the items. Confirm ownership. Set a firm deadline. Offer a neutral handoff option. Avoid loaded language. “Stolen” is a conclusion. “Company-owned equipment not returned after X written requests” is a fact.

3) Lock down data immediately. Disable access. Remote wipe if appropriate. Document what you did and when you did it.

4) Think carefully before calling the police. Sometimes it’s warranted. But it’s also gasoline. If you go that route, assume you’ll be defending the decision to a jury.

5) Don’t let frustration write your emails. Words like “hostage” and “blackmail” feel good in the moment and look terrible in a complaint.

6) A civil replevin or conversion action is a last resort. It may get your property back. It will not avoid litigation. If anything, it invites whatever claims the employee was already contemplating.

Every escalation decision should answer two questions: Is this necessary? And are we prepared to live with the litigation consequences?

Litigation should be a strategy, not a reflex. Act accordingly.

     

Related Stories

  • When does $5,000,000 not equal $5,000,000?
  • The EEOC can’t repeal Bostock, but it’s sure trying
  • A lesson on retaliation from the State of the Union

 

Photo of Jonathan Hyman Jonathan Hyman
Jon Hyman is a trusted advisor to small and mid-sized businesses across various industries, helping them solve workforce challenges and defend against legal disputes.
He is a shareholder at Wickens Herzer Panza in Avon, Ohio, where he chairs the firm’s Employment and Labor
…
Jon Hyman is a trusted advisor to small and mid-sized businesses across various industries, helping them solve workforce challenges and defend against legal disputes.
He is a shareholder at Wickens Herzer Panza in Avon, Ohio, where he chairs the firm’s Employment and Labor practice group and its Craft Beer practice group, and serves on the firm’s Board of Directors. Jon works closely with clients on all aspects of labor and employment law, providing proactive solutions to prevent issues and a strong defense in litigation when conflicts arise.
As outside in-house counsel, Jon is the go-to advisor businesses call when they need help with employee terminations, drafting policies, handling leave or accommodations, or navigating tricky internal complaints. He also brings deep expertise in areas like wage and hour compliance, workplace technology issues, and union avoidance. Jon builds lasting partnerships with his clients, understanding their unique challenges and helping them achieve long-term compliance and success
When it comes to litigation, Jon stands up for businesses in disputes over discrimination, harassment, wrongful discharge, non-competes, trade secrets, wage and hour issues, and union matters. Jon works with his clients to craft targeted defense strategies that protect their interests and aim for resolutions that support their broader business goals.
Jon also leads the firm’s Craft Beer practice, where he helps breweries, brewpubs, taprooms, and other craft beer businesses tackle their unique legal and regulatory needs.
Jon writes the award-winning Ohio Employer Law Blog, which the ABA Blawg Hall of Fame recognized for its daily insights on labor and employment law. His updates help his clients, HR professionals, and other business leaders stay ahead of labor and employment law changes that impact their daily operations.
Read more about Jonathan HymanEmailJonathan's Linkedin Profile
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Employment & Labor
  • Blog:
    Ohio Employer Law Blog
  • Organization:
    Wickens Herzer Panza
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo