Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Colorado’s PTFA Litigation Wave: Liability for Listing Cell Phone Numbers Without Consent and Why It Puts Data Brokers at Risk

By Odia Kagan on June 24, 2026
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Table of Contents

  • What the law says
  • Additional exposure: Data broker laws
  • What should companies do?
  • The takeaway:

If you list cellphone numbers in a directory for a commercial purpose without consent, you could be liable under the Colorado Prevention of Telemarketing Fraud Act, Colo. Rev. Stat. § 6-1-304(4)(a)(I). A new class action filed in federal court in Colorado pursues exactly this claim, the latest in a wave of similar complaints filed against companies over the last couple of years.

Link to What the law says What the law says

Under the Colorado statute:

On or after September 1, 2005, a person commits an unlawful telemarketing practice if the person knowingly: (I) Lists a cellular telephone number in a directory for a commercial purpose unless the person whose number has been listed has given affirmative consent, through written, oral, or electronic means, to such listing[.]

Link to Additional exposure: Data broker laws Additional exposure: Data broker laws

If you collect these phone numbers from third parties and make them available to third parties for valuable consideration, you may also be a data broker, subject to registration and consumer rights requirements under the data broker laws of a growing number of states, including California, Connecticut, Vermont, Oregon, and Texas.

Link to What should companies do? What should companies do?

  1. Ask the threshold question: are you a data broker? If you collect personal information that does not come directly from the individual and you make it available to third parties, engage counsel to determine whether you qualify as a “data broker” under U.S. state data broker laws, and take the compliance steps that follow. Those steps may include:
  • Registration requirements
  • Privacy disclosures
  • Consumer rights, including the right to delete
  • Governance and information security obligations
  1. Treat cellphone numbers as more sensitive. If you collect phone numbers, remember that cellphone numbers can carry heightened sensitivity and may require consent up front under the Colorado law.
  2. Look downstream. Under the amended Vermont data broker law, data brokers are required to adopt a KYC-like duty regarding the intended use of the information by their recipients. (For more detail, see our prior post on Vermont’s amendments: Vermont Amends Its Data Broker Law – What Do You Need to Know.)

Link to The takeaway: The takeaway:

Listing cellphone numbers without consent, can trigger both telemarketing liability and data broker obligations across multiple states. It is worth mapping where your phone number data comes from, how you use it, and who you share it with. Plaintiffs are increasingly doing that first…

  • Posted in:
    Class Action & Mass Torts, Privacy and Cybersecurity
  • Blog:
    Privacy Compliance & Data Security
  • Organization:
    Fox Rothschild LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo