Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

The December 31, 2026 Deadline for SECURE 2.0 Amendments and Restatements: An Opportunity for Improving Your Retirement Plan

By Jerry Kalish on July 7, 2026
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Every employer maintaining a pre-approved defined contribution retirement plan—including 401(k) and 403(b) Plans will need to update their documents by December 31, 2026 to maintain reliance on IRS approval.

401(k) Plans will need to adopt amendments reflecting SECURE 2.0, the most significant retirement plan legislation enacted in many years.

403(b) Plans will need to be restated for what is called Cycle 2, the IRS requirement that 403(b) Plan documents be restated updated to reflect regulatory and legislative changes over the last several years.

While the immediate objective is compliance, the amendment process also provides an opportunity to review the effectiveness of your retirement plan.

Too often, Plan Sponsors view required plan amendments and restatements as simply an administrative exercise — review the documents, sign the required paperwork, distribute participant communications, and move on.

While that approach satisfies the technical requirement, it may overlook an opportunity to review and improve important aspects of your retirement plan, including:

  • Governance and fiduciary oversight
  • Service providers and service delivery
  • Fees and expenses
  • Participant outcomes
  • Plan design
  • Administration and operations

The following six questions can help you determine whether your retirement plan continues to meet the needs of your organization and employees.

1. Are We Meeting Our Fiduciary Responsibilities?

Fiduciary responsibility begins with having a prudent process for making decisions and monitoring a 403(b) Plan. The amendment process provides an excellent opportunity to review governance procedures, committee structures, and the responsibilities assigned to internal personnel and service providers.

2. Are We Receiving the Type of Service We Need?

The needs of an organization change over time. Employee demographics change. Regulations change. Service providers change.

The amendment process provides an opportunity to determine whether the current service model for your 403(b) Plan continues to meet the organization’s needs and objectives.

3. Are We Receiving Value for the Fees Being Paid?

Plan Sponsors should understand what services they receive and what those services cost. Reviewing and benchmarking the expenses of a retirement plan can help determine whether fees remain reasonable and whether participants are receiving appropriate value for those costs.

4. Are We Helping Participants Prepare for Retirement?

A successful retirement plan is measured by more than compliance. Participation rates, deferral rates, employee education, and participant communications all affect retirement readiness.

The amendment process provides an opportunity to evaluate whether your retirement plan is helping participants achieve their long-term retirement goals.

5. Are We Taking Advantage of Available Plan Design Opportunities?

SECURE 2.0 provides Plan Sponsors with additional design options. While not every provision is appropriate for every organization, the amendment process provides a natural opportunity to evaluate whether changes to your retirement plan could improve participant outcomes.

It is also an opportunity to determine whether your retirement plan continues to support the organization’s objectives and workforce demographics.

6. Is Your Retirement Plan Being Operated in Accordance with the Plan Document?

Many compliance issues result not from defective documents, but from operational practices that differ from the written terms of the plan.

Eligibility, contributions, loans, hardship distributions, and administrative procedures should all be reviewed periodically to confirm that the operation of the plan remains consistent with its governing documents.

The Opportunity

401(k) and 403(b) Plan Sponsors will need to adopt amendments and restatements respectively by December 31, 2026.

This is an opportunity to use these compliance requirements as a catalyst for a review of your retirement Plan.

The question is whether you will use the process to improve your retirement plan.

Details to follow.

Photo by Zulian Firmansyah on Unsplash

Jerry Kalish

Jerry Kalish is President of National Benefit Services, Inc., retirement plan consultants and administrators, which he founded in 1978 when 401(k) was enacted into law.

He is a member of the Great Lakes Area TE/GE Council, a 501(c)(3) organization whose members are benefit…

Jerry Kalish is President of National Benefit Services, Inc., retirement plan consultants and administrators, which he founded in 1978 when 401(k) was enacted into law.

He is a member of the Great Lakes Area TE/GE Council, a 501(c)(3) organization whose members are benefit practitioners who meet regularly with the Internal Revenue Service and the Department of Labor on ERISA matters.

Jerry provides continuing education programs for attorneys, CPAs, and the financial services industry and has co-taught the course on non-ERISA retirement plans, 403(b) plans, and 457 plans at John Marshall School of Law LLM Program in Employee Benefits.

He is on the International Advisory Board of The Center on Business and Poverty, a non-profit organization that supports businesses and non-profits that embody the practice of participatory capitalism.

Read more about Jerry KalishEmailJerry's Twitter Profile
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Employment & Labor, Tax
  • Blog:
    The Retirement Plan Blog
  • Organization:
    National Benefit Services, Inc.
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo