Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Three commutes; zero compensation

By Jonathan Hyman on September 21, 2026
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

The Department of Labor just answered a question a lot of employers have been wondering about: if an employee splits her day between home and office, who pays for the drive in between?

TL;DR: Splitting the workday between home and office doesn’t mean paying for the commute.

Start with what’s never been in dispute: the drive to the office in the morning and home at night has never been compensated. That’s true no matter how far away the employee lives, how bad the traffic is, or how many hours she works once she gets there. It’s an ordinary commute, and ordinary commutes have always been on the employee’s own time.

The harder question is what happens when that commute moves to the middle of the workday. A new Wage and Hour Division Opinion Letter works through three real scenarios.

One employee dodges rush hour by working from home in the morning, driving in around 10, working until 3:30, driving home before traffic hits again, and completing their work again from home. Another wants to knock out a volunteer project at home before her regular shift, instead of coming in early. A third rides the city bus, can’t finish before the last one leaves, and asks to take the rest of his work home instead of staying late.

In each case, the employee travels between home and office in the middle of the workday. Under the continuous workday rule, once an employee starts working for the day, “travel from job site to job site during the workday” is paid. For that reason, some employers have assumed that the mid-shift commutes described above are compensated.

They aren’t. The continuous workday rule does not come into play here, because, according to the DOL, it’s all still just a commute.

WHD draws a clean line: an “ordinary” home-to-work commute isn’t work whether it happens at 7 a.m., 6 p.m., or noon. It goes a step further, recognizing a mid-day commute as its own category of unpaid time during the workday, alongside bona fide meal breaks and off-duty time.

The test was never the clock. It’s who benefits. If the mid-day trip is the employee’s idea, taken to beat traffic, catch a bus, or carve out home time, it “primarily benefits the employee.” That makes it ordinary, even if it cuts her total drive time in half.

Two things haven’t changed, though.

1. Work is still work. The hours the employee actually spends working at home, finishing that volunteer project or wrapping up the day’s assignment, get paid in full. Only the drive itself is free.

2. Job-site-to-job-site travel still counts. A repair tech who drives from the office to a customer’s building and back is on the clock the whole time. This letter is about commuting home, not bouncing between worksites.

If you’re building a hybrid or split-shift option, make it genuinely optional, let employees pick their own timing, and keep timekeeping honest about hours actually worked away from the office. Do that, and the commute in between belongs to the employee. Not your payroll.

     

Related Stories

  • Your shift supervisors can’t have it both ways with tipped wages
  • Mathing the overtime calculation for bonuses and incentive comp
  • Pay attention to personal liability for FLSA violations

 

Photo of Jonathan Hyman Jonathan Hyman
Jon Hyman is a trusted advisor to small and mid-sized businesses across various industries, helping them solve workforce challenges and defend against legal disputes.
He is a shareholder at Wickens Herzer Panza in Avon, Ohio, where he chairs the firm’s Employment and Labor
…
Jon Hyman is a trusted advisor to small and mid-sized businesses across various industries, helping them solve workforce challenges and defend against legal disputes.
He is a shareholder at Wickens Herzer Panza in Avon, Ohio, where he chairs the firm’s Employment and Labor practice group and its Craft Beer practice group, and serves on the firm’s Board of Directors. Jon works closely with clients on all aspects of labor and employment law, providing proactive solutions to prevent issues and a strong defense in litigation when conflicts arise.
As outside in-house counsel, Jon is the go-to advisor businesses call when they need help with employee terminations, drafting policies, handling leave or accommodations, or navigating tricky internal complaints. He also brings deep expertise in areas like wage and hour compliance, workplace technology issues, and union avoidance. Jon builds lasting partnerships with his clients, understanding their unique challenges and helping them achieve long-term compliance and success
When it comes to litigation, Jon stands up for businesses in disputes over discrimination, harassment, wrongful discharge, non-competes, trade secrets, wage and hour issues, and union matters. Jon works with his clients to craft targeted defense strategies that protect their interests and aim for resolutions that support their broader business goals.
Jon also leads the firm’s Craft Beer practice, where he helps breweries, brewpubs, taprooms, and other craft beer businesses tackle their unique legal and regulatory needs.
Jon writes the award-winning Ohio Employer Law Blog, which the ABA Blawg Hall of Fame recognized for its daily insights on labor and employment law. His updates help his clients, HR professionals, and other business leaders stay ahead of labor and employment law changes that impact their daily operations.
Read more about Jonathan HymanEmailJonathan's Linkedin Profile
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Employment & Labor
  • Blog:
    Ohio Employer Law Blog
  • Organization:
    Wickens Herzer Panza
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo