In Constantino v. Paul Revere Life Insurance Co., the Massachusetts Appeals Court, in a non-binding decision under Rule 23.0, affirmed a judgment finding that an insurer violated G. L. c. 93A and G. L. c. 176D by unreasonably delaying disability benefits.

The plaintiff sought presumptive total disability benefits under a policy provision covering the total and irrecoverable loss of use of both feet. Although medical evidence submitted described his feet as paralyzed and functionally useless, the insurer repeatedly denied the claim because he could still walk with braces and a walking stick. After the plaintiff retained counsel and threatened litigation, the insurer reconsidered the same evidence, reversed its position, and retroactively paid benefits. The trial judge found that the insurer had adopted an indefensibly aggressive interpretation of the policy and effectively failed to meaningfully investigate the claim for approximately two years.

The Appeals Court rejected the insurer’s argument that its coverage determination reflected merely a good-faith disagreement over policy interpretation. The court emphasized the trial judge’s supported findings that the insurer repeatedly shifted its interpretation of the policy and effectively refused to meaningfully investigate the plaintiff’s claim for two years. Those findings supported liability under G. L. c. 176D, § 3 (9) (c), for failing to adopt and implement reasonable standards for the prompt investigation of claims, and § 3 (9) (f), for failing to effectuate prompt, fair, and equitable settlement once liability became reasonably clear. The court also rejected the insurer’s contention that its eventual payment of all benefits defeated liability. The insurer never responded to the plaintiff’s demand, and the court concluded that it had not made a qualifying prompt and fair settlement offer within 30 days that might limit its exposure under § 9(3).

This decision again reinforces the importance of thoroughly investigating and promptly responding to a c. 93A demand letter.

Photo of Angela C. Bunnell Angela C. Bunnell

Angela Bunnell is a member of the Litigation Practice in Greenberg Traurig’s Boston office. Her practice focuses on defending companies against unfair or deceptive business practices claims in individual and putative class action settings. She also represents companies and individuals responding to civil…

Angela Bunnell is a member of the Litigation Practice in Greenberg Traurig’s Boston office. Her practice focuses on defending companies against unfair or deceptive business practices claims in individual and putative class action settings. She also represents companies and individuals responding to civil investigative demands under various regulatory schemes, including federal and state false claims acts and related enforcement actions brought by federal and state regulatory agencies. Angela also has experience with complex eDiscovery matters, and has been responsible for preservation, collection, review, and production of ESI in state and federal lawsuits. Angela also has experience in representing clients in connection with data security and privacy matters.

Before joining the firm, Angela served as a federal law clerk, providing valuable insight and understanding of the court system and litigation process.

Photo of David G. Thomas David G. Thomas

David advises on individual and corporate disputes during the entire dispute-resolution life cycle, including through strategic negotiation, mediation, other forms of alternative dispute resolution, and adjudication through trial when needed or required. David has experience with many subject matters, including unfair or deceptive…

David advises on individual and corporate disputes during the entire dispute-resolution life cycle, including through strategic negotiation, mediation, other forms of alternative dispute resolution, and adjudication through trial when needed or required. David has experience with many subject matters, including unfair or deceptive business practices disputes in individual and putative class action settings, including under Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 93A—the Massachusetts Consumer Protection Act. Boston magazine selected David as a “Top Lawyer—Class Action” in 2022 and 2023. Also, David works with clients on avoiding disputes proactively by identifying and ameliorating existing or potential dispute risks in business policies and practices.

Photo of Abby Druhot Abby Druhot

Abby M. Druhot is a member of the Litigation Practice in Greenberg Traurig’s Boston office. Abby represents clients in federal and state litigation and government and internal investigations. She has experience defending companies against unfair or deceptive business practices claims in individual and…

Abby M. Druhot is a member of the Litigation Practice in Greenberg Traurig’s Boston office. Abby represents clients in federal and state litigation and government and internal investigations. She has experience defending companies against unfair or deceptive business practices claims in individual and putative class action settings. She also represents companies responding to civil investigative demands under various regulatory schemes and managing their investigations. In addition, Abby has worked on commercial litigation matters involving trade secrets, restrictive covenants, employment matters, and complex commercial disputes.

Photo of Diana A. Balluku Diana A. Balluku

Diana A. Balluku is a member of the Litigation Practice in Greenberg Traurig’s Boston office. Diana’s practice focuses on a wide variety of commercial litigation matters in both state and federal court, including complex business litigation, class action defense, data privacy, trade secret…

Diana A. Balluku is a member of the Litigation Practice in Greenberg Traurig’s Boston office. Diana’s practice focuses on a wide variety of commercial litigation matters in both state and federal court, including complex business litigation, class action defense, data privacy, trade secret, toxic tort and product liability matters. Her practice covers multiple disciplines and industries, including business and commercial entities, technology companies, and health care institutions.

Having earned a Master’s in Public Health, Diana’s practice also focuses on health care litigation and health law. She advises health care and behavioral health providers on regulatory compliance, licensure issues, internal policy and governance, and operational issues.

Prior to joining Greenberg Traurig, Diana served as a law clerk to the Honorable Donald L. Cabell in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts. Diana also worked as a litigation associate in the Boston office of a national firm where she represented clients on toxic tort, product liability and commercial litigation matters in both state and federal courts.