On September 25, 2020, Governor Gavin Newsom signed Assembly Bill 3175, which amends Labor Code section 1700.52 regarding sexual harassment prevention training requirements of age-eligible minors prior to the issuance of entertainment work permits.  Previously, Section 1700.52 required a minor and the parent or legal guardian to complete the sexual harassment prevention training in a language they understood.  Section 1700.52 provided that the training shall be provided by a third-party vendor, on-site, electronically, via Internet Web site, “or other means.”

Now, effective immediately, Section 1700.52 requires that a parent or legal guardian accompany the minor during the sexual harassment prevention training, which shall be provided by the Department of Fair Employment and Housing (“DFEH”) on its internet website.  The training must be conducted in the language understood by the minor and their parent or legal guardian, “whenever reasonably possible.”  Finally, the parent or legal guardian must certify to the Labor Commissioner that the training has been completed.

Assembly Bill 3175 was intended to address confusion surrounding the adoption of new sexual harassment prevention training requirements and their impact on existing regulation of the entertainment industry.

If you have questions about the effects of this legislation, please contact a Jackson Lewis attorney to discuss.

Photo of Leila Nourani Leila Nourani

Leila Nourani is a principal in the Los Angeles, California, office of Jackson Lewis P.C.

Leila’s practice focuses on the defense of employment claims including harassment, discrimination (age, gender, national origin, sexual orientation), retaliation, equal pay and wage and hour. She also has…

Leila Nourani is a principal in the Los Angeles, California, office of Jackson Lewis P.C.

Leila’s practice focuses on the defense of employment claims including harassment, discrimination (age, gender, national origin, sexual orientation), retaliation, equal pay and wage and hour. She also has significant expertise in the defense and prosecution of claims of defamation, misappropriation of trade secrets, unfair competition, violations of California Business and Professions Code Sections 17200, intentional and negligence interference with contract and prospective economic advantage, breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, and CFAA violations. Leila has represented clients before the California Supreme Court in cases that resulted in published opinions in Cummins v. Superior Court and Quarry v. Doe 1.

Leila has 30 years of experience litigating a broad range of cases in both state and federal courts. She is experienced in all phases of litigation and has prosecuted, defended and managed small to complex multi-party cases, including qui tam, representative, and class actions. Leila has jury and bench trial expertise as well as expertise in domestic and international arbitrations. She has also mediated hundreds of cases and served as a volunteer alternative dispute resolution mediator for the Los Angeles County Bar.