Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Update on the Status of OSHA’s Vaccine Mandate

By Perry MacLennan & Chris Gantt-Sorenson on November 16, 2021
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

As of today, OSHA announced that it “has suspended activities related to the implementation and enforcement of the ETS [Emergency Temporary Standard] pending future developments in the litigation.” A link to the announcement can be found here. The announcement came in response to the decision from the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals ordering OSHA to essentially stand down for the time being.

Further legal developments are surely in store, but we will not discuss those procedures in detail here. The question now is how should employers respond in the interim?

First, it is important to determine whether or not you are subject to the OSHA mandate or the mandates applicable to federal contractors or healthcare service providers. The mandates for federal contractors and healthcare providers are not affected by this litigation. If you are subject to the OSHA mandate, you have a decision to make.

One option is to halt implementation of your policy (either mandatory vaccination or vaccinate/testing) pending further clarification from the courts. This option is a bit risky in that the mandate could survive legal challenge in the coming weeks and immediately take effect on the original timeline (December 6/January 4). That could leave you scrambling and force testing upon you for your unvaccinated employees. Everyone is hopeful that if the mandate does survive challenge, OSHA will revise the timeline, but that is uncertain. This option is worth considering for companies with a low workforce vaccination rate and have real labor shortage concerns with implementation.

Option two would be to press forward with implementing your policy. If the mandate survives, your business will be in an optimal position for compliance, even if the timeline is not revised. You may think implementing the policy is a good idea regardless of legal requirements. However, companies pressing forward should be prepared for increased pushback from employees now that the mandate is on hold.

Subscribe to our blog to stay tuned for updates as they become available.

If you have questions about this topic or other employment law matters, please contact Perry, Chris, or the HSB Employment Law practice team.

Photo of Chris Gantt-Sorenson Chris Gantt-Sorenson

Chris Gantt-Sorenson is a highly effective trial lawyer who concentrates in employment defense litigation. Chris chairs Haynsworth Sinkler Boyd’s Employment Law practice group and is a frequent contributor to the group’s SCEmployersBlog.

Read more about Chris Gantt-SorensonEmailChris's Linkedin Profile
  • Posted in:
    Administrative and Regulatory
  • Blog:
    SC Employers’ Blog
  • Organization:
    Haynsworth Sinkler Boyd, P.A.
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo