Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

New York Governor Vetoes Bill Banning Non-Compete Agreements

By Jonathan Wexler on January 22, 2024
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
1705949253-2710368-7653-lxb_photoe05icIFM9F8lxb_photo-
Anthony Fomin, Unsplash

Although non-competition agreements are under ongoing attack at the federal and state levels (including being banned in California, Minnesota, North Dakota, and Oklahoma, among others), New York State is not yet ready to join that movement.  Late last month, New York Governor Kathy Hochul vetoed Senate Bill S3100A, which was passed in June 2023 by the NYS Assembly and the Senate and would have prohibited all non-compete agreements.  In vetoing the bill, Governor Hochul expressed concern about the impact that the legislation would have on the interest of the many businesses operating in the state to protect the competitive advantage that key employees bring.

Some of the issues with S3100A were (i) the absence of a salary level above which non-competes would remain lawful; (ii) the effective elimination of the “employee choice doctrine” that allows employers to condition post-employment incentive compensation on the employee’s refraining from competition, and allows employees to decide whether to accept the money and refrain from competing or forgo the payment and take a competing job; (iii) the prohibition of non-competes even in the context of the sale of a business; and (iv) the failure to address the permissibility of employee non-solicitation agreements, while expressly allowing restrictions on customer non-solicitation agreements.

In all likelihood, a different bill will be introduced sometime this year that prohibits non-competes for only lower-and middle-income employees and includes a sale-of-business exception, which was glaring by its omission from Bill S3100A.  The inability to prevent competition by someone who has just been paid a significant amount of money for a business would doubtless chill mergers and acquisitions statewide. 

Stay tuned for further developments.

Photo of Jonathan Wexler Jonathan Wexler

Jonathan A. Wexler is a Shareholder in Vedder Price’s Labor and Employment practice area in the New York office.

He represents private-sector, not-for-profit and public-sector clients in litigation matters in federal and state courts and before such administrative agencies as the Equal Employment…

Jonathan A. Wexler is a Shareholder in Vedder Price’s Labor and Employment practice area in the New York office.

He represents private-sector, not-for-profit and public-sector clients in litigation matters in federal and state courts and before such administrative agencies as the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the New York State Division of Human Rights, the National Labor Relations Board and the New York Department of Labor.

Read more about Jonathan WexlerEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Employment & Labor
  • Blog:
    Vedder Works
  • Organization:
    Vedder Price PC
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo