Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupport
Contact Us
Search
Close

No Cap! Employer Size Must be Placed at Issue for Damages Caps Under Title VII to Apply

By Diana Evans & Jennifer M. Trulock on May 29, 2026
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
No Cap! Employer Size Must be Placed at Issue for Damages Caps Under Title VII to Apply

On May 28, 2026, the Eleventh Circuit issued an opinion in Khatabi v. Car Auto Holdings, LLC, holding, in relevant part, that an employer waived its ability to request a damages cap under Title VII based on its smaller size because it failed to plead the size damages cap as an affirmative defense.

In the underlying case, an employee sued her former employer and former manager for sex discrimination under both Title VII and the Florida Civil Rights Act (FCRA). Notably, the employer testified at trial that it had around 22 employees. After trial, the jury awarded the employee $81,028 in compensatory damages and $750,000 in punitive damages. On motion, the trial court reduced the employee’s damages to $181,028 based on the punitive damages cap of $100,000 imposed under the FCRA and the $50,000 total damages cap imposed under Title VII for employers with fewer than 101 employees.

The Eleventh Circuit reversed, finding that (1) the damages caps under Title VII and the FCRA applied with a cumulative effect because the jury did not allocate damages between the two statutes and neither statute could impinge upon the other, and (2) that the employer waived the employee-headcount damages cap under Title VII because it did not plead the number of employees as an affirmative defense or otherwise raise it with sufficient notice to the employee that the employee count was at issue. Thus, the Eleventh Circuit concluded that the appropriate cap was $481,028, comprised of $81,028 in compensatory damages permitted under the FCRA, plus the $100,000 statutory cap on damages under the FCRA, and the $300,000 maximum cap on total damages under Title VII.

So, what’s the takeaway from this decision, which applies in the Eleventh Circuit (comprising Florida, Georgia and Alabama)? First, in employment cases involving multiple statutes with damages caps, employers should consider a verdict form that gives jurors the option to allocate damages between multiple statutes. Second, employers with fewer than 500 employees must ensure that employee headcount is pleaded as an affirmative defense (or otherwise placed at issue before trial) or risk waiving the lower damages caps under Title VII based on employee headcount.

Photo of Diana Evans Diana Evans

Diana Evans joined the firm as a member of the Litigation Practice Group after clerking for the Hon. James S. Moody Jr. of the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida. Her practice focuses on commercial litigation in both state and…

Diana Evans joined the firm as a member of the Litigation Practice Group after clerking for the Hon. James S. Moody Jr. of the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida. Her practice focuses on commercial litigation in both state and federal court in areas including product liability and employment law.

Read more about Diana EvansEmail
Show more Show less
Photo of Jennifer M. Trulock Jennifer M. Trulock

Jennifer Trulock advises companies on managing workplace legal issues, conducting investigations into employee misconduct, and preventing employment lawsuits. She also is experienced in handling acquisition/divestiture employment issues, including due diligence, pre-merger planning and post-merger integration issues. Jennifer counsels employers on developing and applying…

Jennifer Trulock advises companies on managing workplace legal issues, conducting investigations into employee misconduct, and preventing employment lawsuits. She also is experienced in handling acquisition/divestiture employment issues, including due diligence, pre-merger planning and post-merger integration issues. Jennifer counsels employers on developing and applying personnel policies and in responding to and resolving complaints before reaching litigation. She also assists clients in negotiating employment agreements, as well as separation agreements.

Read more about Jennifer M. TrulockEmailJennifer's Linkedin Profile
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Employment & Labor
  • Blog:
    Labor & Employment Insights
  • Organization:
    Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo