On July 10, 2026, New York City Department of Consumer and Worker Protection (DCWP) finalized and adopted its “Click-to-Cancel Rule,” which takes effect on Oct. 1, 2026. The Rule remains largely unchanged from the March 25, 2026, Notice of Public Hearing and Opportunity to Comment, which we previously covered.

Adoption of the Click-to-Cancel Rule follows the DCWP’s recently adopted “Hotel Junk Fees” Rule banning hidden fees on hotel stays. DCWP has also proposed a “Junk Fees Rule,” which would apply to businesses beyond hotels. The proposed rule would make it a deceptive and unconscionable trade practice to advertise, display, or offer a price for a good or service without clearly and conspicuously disclosing the total price, including all mandatory fees and charges. “For years, companies have built their business model around making it harder for working people to hold onto their money,” said Mayor Mamdani in a press release. “Whether it’s hidden fees that suddenly appear at checkout or subscriptions that take one click to sign up for and a dozen steps to cancel, the result is the same: working people pay more while corporations profit. That ends now. If you can sign up with one click, you can cancel with one click.”

“The Mamdani Administration is shutting the door on the era of fleecing New Yorkers with junk fees and subscription traps,” said Commissioner Samuel A.A. Levine. “These two rules will ensure that the price you see is the price you pay—no hidden charges, no endless subscription services and no advantages for businesses that cheat. Requiring companies to compete on price will lower costs for all New Yorkers and level the playing field for honest businesses.”

Link to Click-to-Cancel Rule Highlights Click-to-Cancel Rule Highlights

The rule applies to a subscription for any type of goods or services that meets the definitions of automatic renewals (plans in which a paid subscription or purchasing agreement is automatically renewed at the end of a definite term for a subsequent term) or continuous service offers (plans in which a subscription or purchasing agreement continues until the consumer cancels the service).

The rule requires that businesses:

  • Provide Clear, Conspicuous Pre‑Purchase Disclosures: Businesses must disclose — prominently and in close proximity to consent requests — the description of the subscription, total cost and billing frequency, cancellation deadlines, cancellation methods, and the terms of any free trials, gifts, or temporary pricing (including when and how prices change) before requesting consumers’ consent or billing information.
  • Offer Simple Cancellation Mechanisms: Businesses must allow consumers to cancel subscription plans at any time using a simple mechanism through the same medium they used to enroll (e.g., online sign‑up would require an online cancellation option) and through all methods in which the business allows consumers to provide consent to the subscription plan or renewal. Where the consumer enrolled in person, businesses must still offer online cancellation options “where practical.”
  • Prohibit Cancellation Obstructions: Businesses are prohibited from obstructing or unreasonably delaying cancellation, expressly prohibiting businesses from hanging up on consumers who call to cancel, obscuring cancellation pathways, misrepresenting cancellation consequences or delays, or offering retention discounts or benefits while simultaneously obstructing or delaying cancellation.
  • Issue Renewal and Change Notices: Businesses must issue advance notice: (a) 15 to 45 days before cancellation deadline for renewals for subscriptions with an initial paid term of one year or more; (b) 3 to 21 days before the first billing deadline for free trials longer than one month; and (c) 5 to 30 days before any material changes, including price increases. Businesses must also deliver notices via the consumer’s selected channel (email, text, app notification, etc.) and include cancellation instructions.

The rule goes into effect Oct. 1, 2026. After this date, companies found violating the rule face an initial $525 fine per violation and up to $3,500 for repeat offenses, and are liable for restitution of the amounts charged after a consumer’s first cancellation attempt.

Certain businesses — such as entities regulated by the Department of Financial Services, banks and other licensed financial institutions, and certain sellers of insurance — are exempt from the rule.

Link to Hotel Junk Fees Rule Highlights Hotel Junk Fees Rule Highlights

The rule applies to any person who offers, displays, or advertises the price of a stay in a hotel in New York City or who offers, displays, or advertises the price of a stay in a hotel to a New York City consumer.

The rule requires that businesses:

  • Display All-In Pricing: Hotels and booking platforms must clearly disclose the total price of a stay, including all mandatory fees, whenever a price is advertised or displayed. Taxes and government-imposed fees may be excluded.
  • Prohibit Misleading Fee Descriptions: Businesses may not misrepresent the nature, purpose, amount, or refundability of hotel fees or charges.
  • Disclose Excluded Fees: Before a consumer pays, businesses must disclose any fees excluded from the advertised total price, the purpose and amount of those fees, and the final amount the consumer must pay.
  • Disclose Deposit and Hold Policies: Before a consumer pays, businesses must disclose the hotel’s general deposit or hold policy, the standard hold/deposit amount, circumstances under which some or all of the deposit may be retained, and the approximate timeframe for release or refund.

Companies found violating the rule face an initial $525 fine per violation and up to $3,500 for repeat offenses.

The rule went into effect on Feb. 21, 2026, with the deposit and hold requirement provisions effective Jan. 22, 2027.

Link to Proposed Junk Fee Rule Highlights Proposed Junk Fee Rule Highlights

The proposed rule would make it a deceptive and unconscionable trade practice to advertise, display, or offer a price for a good or service without clearly and conspicuously disclosing the total price, including all mandatory fees and charges. The proposed rule would apply generally to any person or business offering, displaying, or advertising goods or services in New York City or to New York City consumers.

  • Advertised Prices Must Include Mandatory Fees: The proposed rule would require that any advertised or displayed price must include all mandatory fees and charges that a consumer must pay to purchase the product or service. Mandatory fees include fees that are not reasonably avoidable by consumers, fees that are difficult to remove during the purchasing process, and charges for aspects of the product or service that a reasonable consumer would expect to be included in the advertised offering.
  • Total Price Must Be Prominent: The proposed rule would require businesses to display the total price at least as prominently as any other pricing information. This requirement applies whether pricing is expressed as a fixed amount, hourly rate, monthly fee, or per-unit charge.
  • Additional Fee Breakdown Before Purchase: Before a consumer consents to pay, businesses would be required to provide a clear breakdown of any fees excluded from the advertised total price, the nature, purpose, and amount of those charges, the product or service associated with the charge, and the final amount the consumer must pay. Taxes, government-imposed fees, and certain actual shipping or postage charges may be excluded from the advertised total price but must still be disclosed before payment.
  • Recordkeeping Requirements: The proposed rule would require that business maintain records sufficient to substantiate the basis, purpose, amount, and refundability of fees and charges; businesses would be required to provide those records to DCWP upon request. Failure to maintain or produce required records might create a presumption in an enforcement action that DCWP’s allegations regarding those fees are true.

Companies found violating the rule as proposed would face an initial $525 fine per violation and up to $3,500 for repeat offenses.

DCWP will hold a public hearing on the proposed Junk Fees Rule on Aug. 7, 2026, at 11:00 a.m. ET; any person or party interested in submitting comments should do so by Aug. 7, 2026.

Link to Takeaways for Businesses Takeaways for Businesses

New York City’s Click-to-Cancel Rule, Hotel Junk Fees Rule, and proposed Junk Fees Rule reflect a growing regulatory trend toward comprehensive price and subscription transparency requirements. And, if adopted, New York City’s Junk Fees Rule would create one of the broadest local all-in pricing requirements in the United States.

Businesses advertising to New York City consumers should consider reviewing their online checkout flows, pricing displays, subscription offerings, booking platforms, and fee practices to confirm that mandatory charges are included in advertised prices and supported by appropriate documentation. And Companies using negative option features — automatic renewals, continuity programs, trial‑to‑paid conversions, or bundled offers — should consider proactively evaluating their disclosures, consent mechanisms, renewal-notification practices, and cancellation pathways to comply with the nationwide patchwork of requirements.

We have provided ongoing analysis and commentary regarding developments concerning all-in-pricing requirements in advertising and auto-renewal subscriptions, including the prior client alerts and blog posts listed below:

Tags: AI
Photo of Timothy A. Butler Timothy A. Butler

Tim Butler helps companies thrive by developing tailored strategies to address their regulatory compliance challenges and vigorously defending them in government enforcement actions and bet-the-company lawsuits.

A former prosecuting attorney for the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and former senior official in the Georgia…

Tim Butler helps companies thrive by developing tailored strategies to address their regulatory compliance challenges and vigorously defending them in government enforcement actions and bet-the-company lawsuits.

A former prosecuting attorney for the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and former senior official in the Georgia Attorney General’s Office, Tim has led the defense of dozens of government investigations and enforcement actions brought by the FTC, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), and the various state attorneys general. Tim also regularly defends clients in bet-the-company lawsuits, including complex business disputes and consumer class actions alleging privacy, false advertising, and unfair or deceptive business practice claims.

Tim is an experienced guide for companies struggling with regulatory complexity. He offers clear advice that helps his clients meet the demands of the ever-growing set of laws and regulations governing data privacy and cybersecurity, advertising and marketing practices, and consumer financial products and services. Clients rely on Tim’s business-minded and practical strategies to address their most difficult regulatory compliance challenges.

A graduate of the University of Chicago and Stanford Law School, Tim is a prolific author and regularly speaks to industry and trade groups about the evolving privacy landscape, about cutting-edge issues affecting payments and fintech companies, and about developments at the FTC, the CFPB, and within the state attorneys general community.

Read more about Timothy A. ButlerEmailTimothy's Linkedin Profile
Show more Show less
Photo of Matthew White Matthew White

Matt White guides clients through regulatory compliance challenges and represents clients in regulatory and civil investigations and litigation.

Matt has counseled fintech and payment companies on regulatory compliance matters, including those involving the Electronic Fund Transfer Act, the Fair Credit Reporting Act, the…

Matt White guides clients through regulatory compliance challenges and represents clients in regulatory and civil investigations and litigation.

Matt has counseled fintech and payment companies on regulatory compliance matters, including those involving the Electronic Fund Transfer Act, the Fair Credit Reporting Act, the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, the Truth in Lending Act, and their respective implementing regulations (Regulations E, V, P, and Z). Adept with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s (CFPB) Prepaid Rule, Matt has provided guidance regarding prepaid cards and related compliance.

Matt has also aided clients in developing regulatory compliant products and functionalities, including an earned wage access program, reimbursement prepaid card programs, new merchant cash advance products, and tokenized payment capabilities. In connection with products on which Matt advises, he has also negotiated high-stakes technology sales agreements involving complex regulatory issues, including compliance with data privacy laws, financial regulations, and card network rules.

Beyond helping clients strategize for regulatory complexity, Matt also helps clients navigate government investigations and enforcement actions brought by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), CFPB, and state attorneys general.

Read more about Matthew WhiteEmailMatthew's Linkedin Profile
Show more Show less
Photo of Tessa Cierny Tessa Cierny

Tessa Cierny advises companies on financial technology and data privacy issues. She has experience counseling companies on state and federal regulatory compliance, including existing and emerging privacy laws, such as the E.U.’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the California Consumer Privacy Act

…

Tessa Cierny advises companies on financial technology and data privacy issues. She has experience counseling companies on state and federal regulatory compliance, including existing and emerging privacy laws, such as the E.U.’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA), as well as financial and banking regulations, such as the CFPB’s Section 1071 Small Business Lending Rule (Regulation B). In addition, she assists clients in defending business disputes and data breach litigation.

Prior to joining Greenberg Traurig, she served as global records manager for WestRock, where she developed and implemented email and data retention policies for global data privacy regulation compliance. In this role, she also advised on data privacy concerns related to data retention, data loss prevention, and data governance.

Read more about Tessa CiernyEmailTessa L.'s Linkedin Profile
Show more Show less
Photo of Cody B. Davis Cody B. Davis

Cody Davis advises clients on regulatory compliance, data privacy, and consumer protection matters within the financial technology sector, with a focus on payments, emerging platforms, and evolving regulatory frameworks. He works with companies navigating complex federal and state requirements, including regulatory compliance, government…

Cody Davis advises clients on regulatory compliance, data privacy, and consumer protection matters within the financial technology sector, with a focus on payments, emerging platforms, and evolving regulatory frameworks. He works with companies navigating complex federal and state requirements, including regulatory compliance, government investigations, and risk management across the fintech ecosystem.

Cody also has prior experience working with clients in the health care space on mergers and acquisitions as well as regulatory compliance with HIPAA, state telehealth rules, and facility licensure requirements.

Read more about Cody B. DavisEmailCody B.'s Linkedin Profile
Show more Show less
Photo of Ellen M. Gustafson Ellen M. Gustafson

Ellen M. Gustafson advises clients on a range of legislative, budget and regulatory matters, with a particular focus on matters in front of the New York City Council.

Ellen represents not for profit organizations through the New York City budget process. She advises…

Ellen M. Gustafson advises clients on a range of legislative, budget and regulatory matters, with a particular focus on matters in front of the New York City Council.

Ellen represents not for profit organizations through the New York City budget process. She advises clients on virtually all aspects of the budget process including but not limited to: submitting applications, advocating with key stake holders for initiative funding, award registration and purpose of funding issues. Ellen also assists clients on the introduction and negotiation of legislation at the New York City Council as well as the rulemaking process and agency implementation.

Ellen’s practice extends to the hospitality field, where she represents clients’ interests on liquor licensing and related matters before community boards and city agencies, as well as New York State Liquor Authority hearing officers and commissioners.

Ellen previously served as director of operations for former New York City Council Member Dan Garodnick’s office, where she learned the ins and outs of the Council and cultivated relationships across all levels of government which she continues to maintain to assist clients.

Read more about Ellen M. GustafsonEmailEllen's Linkedin Profile
Show more Show less