Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupport
Contact Us
Search
Close

Illinois Looks to Join States Licensing Small Business Lenders

By Costas “Gus” Avrakotos, Francis L. Doorley & Kris D. Kully on April 30, 2016
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Small Business Loan

The Illinois Senate Financial Institutions Committee recently approved a measure, Senate Bill 2865, that seeks to license and regulate business-purpose lenders.  While the bill may be delayed as the bill’s sponsor, Senator Jacqueline Collins, seeks feedback from affected industries, SB 2865 has the potential to significantly affect both the primary and secondary small business loan market in the state.

SB 2865 states that its purpose is to protect small businesses from abusive lending practices and help those borrowers avoid defaults.  Most significantly, it would impose a licensing obligation on lending activities related to closed- or open-end business-purpose loans or merchant cash advances of $250,000 or less, regardless of the interest rate.  The bill appears to require licensing for persons engaged in making or taking assignment of those loans, but it also could be read to require licensing of persons arranging, investing in, or acting as the agent of a person making the loans.  The bill exempts certain banks, savings banks, and credit unions, and also exempts certain nonprofits and SBA business assistance organizations from the licensing provisions.

In addition to licensing, SB 2865 would, if enacted, impose significant compliance obligations on small business lenders in Illinois, including:

  • Ability-to-Repay Underwriting.  SB 2865 would prohibit a lender from making a small business loan if the total monthly loan payments exceed 50% of the borrower’s monthly net revenue, and would require a lender to obtain official documentation to determine a borrower’s monthly net revenue.  If a loan is secured by a personal guarantee, the lender would have to obtain and consider a credit report from one of the major credit bureaus, and report repayment information to one major credit bureau.
  • Advertising Restrictions.  SB 2865 would ban false, misleading, or deceptive advertising for small business loans.
  • No Mandatory ACH Repayment.  SB 2865 would prohibit lenders from conditioning small business loans on the borrower repaying the loan by preauthorized electronic fund transfers.
  • Fee Limitations.  SB 2865 would impose a $25 limit on insufficient funds fees, and impose a late fee limitation of the lesser of $100 or 5% of the late payment.  The bill also would restrict charges that a lender can impose upon refinancing or default.
  • Required Disclosures.  The bill would require lenders to provide certain disclosures prior to consummation, including the loan term, APR, total payments, fees, and all loan options that the borrower qualifies for.

A lender violating those obligations would be subject to a civil action brought by a borrower, as well as administrative action brought by state regulators.

If SB 2865 is enacted in its current form, Illinois will join a handful of states (like California) that currently license business-purpose lenders.  We expect more states will follow, as they become increasingly concerned about small business lending, particularly in the marketplace lending space.  Certainly small business lenders will face increased data collection and reporting obligations, as the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau begins its “outreach and research” process later this year, which will result in HMDA-like reporting on small and women/minority-owned business lending.

Photo of Costas “Gus” Avrakotos Costas “Gus” Avrakotos
Read more about Costas “Gus” AvrakotosEmail
Photo of Francis L. Doorley Francis L. Doorley

Frank Doorley is a partner in Mayer Brown’s Washington DC office and a member of the Financial Services Regulatory & Enforcement group. He handles a broad range of federal and state regulatory compliance matters, primarily for consumer financial product and service providers.  Frank…

Frank Doorley is a partner in Mayer Brown’s Washington DC office and a member of the Financial Services Regulatory & Enforcement group. He handles a broad range of federal and state regulatory compliance matters, primarily for consumer financial product and service providers.  Frank has significant experience advising lenders, consumer finance providers, and investors on compliance obligations under federal and state law. His experience covers a range of products and program structures, including Fintech and marketplace lending programs, retail and home improvement financing, general-purpose unsecured credit, and small business lending and alternative financing. He regularly provides guidance on federal consumer financial laws such as the Truth in Lending Act (TILA), Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA) and the CFPB Mortgage Servicing Rules, Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA), Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA), Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA), Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (SCRA) and prohibitions on unfair, deceptive, and abusive acts and practices (UDAAP).

Read Frank’s full bio.

Read more about Francis L. DoorleyEmail
Show more Show less
Photo of Kris D. Kully Kris D. Kully
Read more about Kris D. KullyEmail
  • Posted in:
    Other
  • Blog:
    Consumer Financial Services Review
  • Organization:
    Mayer Brown
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo