Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupport
Contact Us
Search
Close

Supreme Court to Decide Whether Title VII Prohibits Discrimination Against Gay and Transgender Employees

By William P. Flanagan & David Mitchell on April 22, 2019
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Following months of speculation, the Supreme Court announced today that it would decide whether the prohibition in Title VII against discrimination “because of sex” encompasses discrimination against gay and transgender workers.

The Supreme Court agreed to hear two cases, one from the Second Circuit and another from the Eleventh Circuit, that reached opposing conclusions on whether gay workers are protected by Title VII.  In Altitude Express Inc. v. Zarda, No. 17-1623, a case brought by a skydiving instructor who was fired after disclosing his sexual orientation at work, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals concluded en banc that sexual orientation discrimination is motivated at least in part by sex and therefore unlawful.   The Eleventh Circuit ruled in Bostock v. Clayton County, Georgia, No. 17-1618, which was brought by a man who was discharged after it became known that he participated in a gay recreational softball league, that firing an employee based on sexual orientation is not prohibited by Title VII.   Altitude Express and Bostock illustrate a broader conflict in the federal courts and agencies.  For example, both the Seventh Circuit and the EEOC have also ruled that discrimination based on sexual orientation is a form of sex discrimination prohibited by Title VII, and lower courts throughout the country are split on the question.  Altitude Express and Bostock have been consolidated by the Supreme Court.

In another case, the Supreme Court announced that it will decide whether Title VII prohibits discrimination against transgender people.  In R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, No. 18-107, a transitioning transgender woman was fired after she announced that she would start wearing women’s clothes at work.  The Sixth Circuit held in favor of the employee, ruling that “Discrimination ‘because of sex’ inherently includes discrimination against employees because of a change in their sex.”

These cases are likely to generate a lot of commentary in the coming months.  They will be heard and decided during the next term.

Photo of William P. Flanagan William P. Flanagan
Read more about William P. FlanaganEmail
Photo of David Mitchell David Mitchell

Clients turn to David Mitchell for pragmatic, client-centered counsel for labor and employment matters.

Read more about David MitchellEmailDavid's Linkedin Profile
  • Posted in:
    Employment & Labor
  • Blog:
    All in a Day's Work: The Employer's Legal Guide
  • Organization:
    Hogan Lovells
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo