Province also appoints Clarissa Pearce as a justice assigned in Calgary
Alberta Court of Appeal sets aside firearm conviction due to conclusory reasons
Trial ruling was contradictory in considering accused’s theory, appeal court finds
Hong Kong Shredded Coconut recalled in Canada because of Salmonella contamination
Hong Kong Market Ltd. is recalling Hong Kong brand Shredded Coconut because of possible Salmonella contamination, according to the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA).
The recall was triggered by CFIA test results.
The recalled product was distributed in Alberta, Canada.
Al Kanater Tahini recalled in Canada because of Salmonella contamination
Elsafadi Investments Ltd. is recalling Al Kanater brand Tahini because of possible Salmonella contamination, according to the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA).
The recall was triggered by CFIA test results.
The recalled product was distributed in Alberta, Canada.
Recalled product:
Alberta Court of King’s Bench finds exclusion from coverage due to cannabis oil production
Insured alleges breach of duties to indemnify and defend against claim for injury caused by fire
Alberta Court of King’s Bench finds exclusion from coverage due to weed oil production
Insured alleges breach of duties to indemnify and defend against claim for injury caused by fire
Alberta Court of Appeal refuses to restore appeals due to lack of security for costs
Ex-medical professional alleges conspiracy to undermine his career
Alberta Court of Appeal refuses to restore ex-doctor’s appeals due to lack of security for costs
Ex-nuclear medicine physician alleges conspiracy to undermine his professional career
Pat Draws Reprimand
The Alberta Law Society Hearing Committee Report imposed an oral reprimand of an attorney To summarize the Agreed Statement, I note the following:
- The Complainant was a contractor who worked for Mr. Ellert;
- On one occasion, Mr. Ellert patted the
Court Considers Several Common, but Complex Financial Issues in Two-Day Hearing
In MacDonald v. MacDonald 2025 ABKB 72 Justice Lema considered several important issues that often present themselves in family law cases.
The first question posed was whether post-separation Mr. MacDonald was obliged to pay child and spousal support during the