Virginia courts apply the “source of duty” rule to distinguish contract claims from tort claims. A contracting party may recover in tort only if the breached duty arises independently under common law, not merely from the parties’ contract. If the
Berlik Law is a legal publisher that provides detailed analyses and commentary on various aspects of law, focusing on litigation, contracts, defamation, legislative immunity, and related legal principles. The organization covers case law developments, court rulings, and legal doctrines primarily within the context of Virginia law, illustrating practical applications and implications of legal standards. Its content often addresses issues such as contract enforceability, defamation claims, legislative and sovereign immunity, and remedies like unjust enrichment. Berlik Law's publications serve legal professionals and others interested in nuanced legal interpretations and recent judicial decisions.
Virginia courts apply the “source of duty” rule to distinguish contract claims from tort claims. A contracting party may recover in tort only if the breached duty arises independently under common law, not merely from the parties’ contract. If the…
When drafting non-solicitation agreements, precision matters. Undefined terms and sweeping restrictions can render an entire covenant unenforceable. And in Virginia, courts won’t lift a finger to fix the problem. Employers drafting non-solicitation agreements need to define their key terms…
Under Virginia’s business-conspiracy statute, a successful plaintiff may recover three times the actual damages caused by the conspiracy: “Any person who shall be injured in his reputation, trade, business or profession by reason of a violation of § 18.2-499, may…
The relation-back doctrine is a procedural mechanism that allows an amended pleading filed after the expiration of a statute of limitations to “relate back” to the filing date of the original complaint. The doctrine treats the amended pleading as if…
In a recent decision underscoring the limits of defamation law in political contexts, a federal district court dismissed defamation claims brought by the American Conservative Union and its foundation against former employees who allegedly linked the organizations to George Soros,…
The ecclesiastical abstention doctrine traces its roots to Supreme Court precedent holding that the First Amendment secures a sphere of institutional autonomy for religious organizations. Under this jurisprudence, churches enjoy freedom from secular intrusion in matters central to their identity,…
Proof of damages is an essential element to any claim for breach of contract. The plaintiff has the “burden of proving with reasonable certainty the amount of damages and the cause from which they resulted.” (See Sunrise Continuing Care, LLC…
Truthful statements are generally not actionable as defamation. A substantially true statement that is factually accurate in all material respects and that does not imply any undisclosed defamatory message is not something upon which a defamation lawsuit may be brought.…