Skip to main content

Statute

CEQA

1,312 published works

  1. CEQA Developments

    CEQA Categorical Exemption Case Opinion Ordered Slightly Modified By Supreme Court; Berkeley Hillside Preservation Judgment Is Unaffected

    By Arthur F. Coon

    On May 27, 2015, the California Supreme Court filed a 4-page order modifying portions of the majority and concurring opinions previously filed March 2, 2015, in Berkeley Hillside Preservation v.…

  2. CEQA Developments

    Fourth District Holds CEQA Does Not Require City To Predict ESHA Determinations In Approving Project Over Which Coastal Commission Retains Permitting Jurisdiction, And Applies Deferential Standard In Reversing Trial Court’s General Plan Inconsistency Finding

    By Arthur F. Coon

    In a published opinion filed May 20, 2015, the Fourth District Court of Appeal reversed the trial court’s judgment granting mandate relief based on a general plan violation, affirmed its…

  3. Administrative and Regulatory

    Court Defers to the City of Newport Beach’s Interpretation of its General Plan

    By Thomas Law Group

    In Banning Ranch Conservancy v. City of Newport Beach 2015 Cal. App. LEXIS 436, the Fourth District Court of Appeal upheld an approval by the City of Newport Beach (City)…

  4. California Land Use & Development Law Report

    Court Rejects Another Attempt to Stop New Kings Arena

    By Christopher Chou

    Opponents of the Sacramento Arena project took another shot at halting the new Kings arena project, challenging the city’s certification of the project EIR on a variety of grounds. But…

  5. Land Use Law Blog

    “Happily ever after?” Not according to the neighbors of rural wedding site venue.

    By Abbott & Kindermann, Inc.

    NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR RURAL WEDDING SITE VENUE SET ASIDE DUE TO POTENTIAL ROAD AND NOISE IMPACTS By William W. Abbott Keep Our Mountains Quiet v. County of Santa Clara (May…

  6. California Land Use & Development Law Report

    California Department of Fish and Wildlife’s EIR for Fish-Stocking and Hatchery Program Upheld

    By Julie Jones

    A court of appeal has held that the first-ever environmental impact report for the state’s fish hatchery and stocking programs complies with CEQA, but also found that three of the…

  7. Administrative and Regulatory

    City of San Diego v. Trustees of the California State University, S199557. (D057446; 201 Cal.App.4th 1134; San Diego County Superior Court; GIC855643, GIC855701, 37-2007-00083692-CU-WM-CTL, 37-2007-00083773-CU-MC-CTL, 37-2007-00083768-CU-TT-CTL.)

    By Thomas Law Group

    This post is part of a series highlighting the CEQA cases currently pending before the California Supreme Court. Petition for Review Granted April 18, 2012 Current Status Fully briefed by…

  8. CEQA Developments

    Sixth District Applies CEQA’s “Fair Argument” Standard, Holds That Despite Project’s Compliance With Local Noise Ordinance, EIR Rather Than Mitigated Negative Declaration Is Required Based On Factual, Non-Expert Evidence Of Noise And Traffic Safety Impacts

    By Arthur F. Coon

    On May 7, 2015, the Sixth District Court of Appeal filed a published opinion addressing numerous issues of interest under CEQA’s “fair argument” test for preparing an Environmental Impact Report…

  9. California Land Use & Development Law Report

    Appellate Court Reaffirms Broad Discretion of Trial Courts to Determine Appropriate Attorneys’ Fees

    By Perkins Coie

    The Fourth Appellate District upheld the trial court’s award of less than 10% of the fees requested by the prevailing petitioner in a CEQA case, finding no abuse of the…

  10. Real Estate, Land Use & Environmental Law Blog

    Abuse of Discretion Not Shown By Court’s Failure To “Show Its Arithmetic” in Significantly Reducing Claimed Attorney Fees in CEQA Litigation

    By Tetlo Emmen, Whitney Hodges

    In Save Our Uniquely Rural Community Environment v. County of San Bernardino, __  Cal.App.4th ___, 2015 WL 1259781 (4th Dist., Div. 2, 2015) (SOURCE) , the Fourth District Court of…