Topic
Harassment
682 published works
Dentons Insights
On loan, but still protected? Secondments and liability for third-party harassment
By Dentons
United Kingdom: From 30 October 2026, employers will face new liability for harassment of their employees by third parties. A football loan dispute highlights what this could mean for employers…
Canadian Lawyer Mag
Legal regulators must hold law firms accountable for harassment
Law societies hold powers that reach law firms. Cases using them against a firm’s workplace: I found none
California Employment Law Update
California’s 2027 Employment Laws: More Rules, Higher Stakes
By Tony Oncidi, Dixie Morrison
Fall has arrived, and Sacramento once again has supplied California employers with something scarier than Halloween ghouls: another round of workplace legislation. This year’s harvest includes restrictions on artificial intelligence,…
Ogletree Deakins Insights
California Adds Anti-Hate Speech Component to Mandatory Harassment Prevention Training
By ByChristopherW.Olmsted@ogletree.com
Quick Hits Beginning January 1, 2028, employers already subject to California’s mandatory harassment prevention training requirements must incorporate an anti-hate speech component into that training. AB 1803 does not create…
Dentons Insights
UK Employment and Pensions newsletter – September 2026
By Dentons
United Kingdom: Each month, we look at some of the key employment and pension issues affecting our clients' workforces. In this edition, we explore: the enforceability of training repayment clauses; a…
California Employment Law Update
Hundreds Of Employees May Join Their Racial-Harassment Claims
By Tony Oncidi
Smith v. Superior Court, 121 Cal. App. 5th 607 (2026) Hundreds of current and former employees alleged racial harassment and discrimination at a single factory, including a companywide practice of…
Legal Futures Blog
Tribunal “wrong to punish law firm” over unfair dismissal
By Neil Rose
Tayler: Tribunal erred in its analysisA law firm which discriminated against a paralegal should not have to pay aggravated damages simply because it advised on employment law, a judge has…
Herston on Tennessee Family Law
Mutual Hostility Does Not Require Mutual Orders of Protection in Lawrenceburg, Tennessee: Kelley v. Bowden
By K.O. Herston
Facts: Two Neighbors—Ms. Kelley and Ms. Bowden—lived across the street from each other at the end of a dead-end street. Their relationship deteriorated after a dispute over a visitor’s box…
The Indian Lawyer Blog
SUPREME COURT RULES GENERAL HARASSMENT WITHOUT SPECIFIC INTENT DOES NOT AMOUNT TO ABETMENT OF SUICIDE
Sanjay Kumar v. State of Himachal Pradesh, Criminal Appeal No. 1108 of 2016 (2026 INSC 948) The Supreme Court, in Sanjay Kumar v. State of Himachal Pradesh, has set aside…
Religion Clause
Confrontation Between Jewish and Muslim High School Students Leads to Complex Court Decision
Hiester v. School District of Philadelphia, (ED PA, Aug. 21, 2026), is a 41-page opinion covering complex allegations of competing anti-Muslim and anti-Jewish harassment by high school students and high school…