Topic
Liability
597 published works
Wisconsin Trial Lawyers Blog
Who Is Responsible for Injuries in an Accident With a Delivery Driver?
By GRGB Lawyers
By: Attorney Chris Strohbehn and Paralegal Ruth Campos If it seems like there are increasing numbers of delivery vehicles on the roads, that is likely due to increased demand for…
Tort Talk
Although Noted To Be "Absurd," the "Dicta" of Spencer v. Johnson Regarding the Fair Share Act Applied in a Monroe County Case
In the case of Ace v. Ace, No. 6242-CIVIL-2020 (C.P. Monroe Co. Jan. 12, 2023 Williamson, J.), the court issued an Opinion in a non-jury trial arising out of a…
TortsProf Blog
Oral Argument in Gonzalez v. Google
...apparently did not go well, with several justices admitting they were confused. The Court is being urged to narrow the protection offered by Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. …
Zalma on Insurance
Liability Insurance Only Protects Other than the Insured
By Barry Zalma
Third Party Insurance Only Protects Damage to Other than the Insured See the full video at https://rumble.com/v27z52z-liability-insurance-only-protects-other-than-the-insured.html and at https://youtu.be/rlkxxfG4QOE Finger Oil &Gas, Inc. (“Finger Oil”), the insured, and Mid-Continent…
Napoli Shkolnik Blog
How to Dispute Fault in a Car Accident Claim?
Additional evidence and applicable legal doctrines often change the fault determination in a car accident. So, it’s possible to dispute fault, you just need to be prepared. Emergency responders usually…
California Employment Law Update
Hirer Of Independent Contractor Is Not Liable For Injury To Contractor’s Employee
By Tony Oncidi
Miller v. Roseville Lodge No. 1293, 83 Cal. App. 5th 825 (2022) Roseville Lodge No. 1293, Loyal Order of Moose, Inc., hired Charlie Gelatini to move an ATM on its…
New Jersey Insurance Coverage Litigation
The trouble with “no action” clauses
By Gene Killian
I had a brief but interesting conversation with a couple of colleagues recently. The topic was so-called "no action" clauses in liability insurance policies. "No action" clauses try to create…
Technology Law Dispatch
What happens when AI goes wrong? The proposed EU AI Liability Directive
By Sarah O'Brien, Sophie Vella
On 28 September 2022, the European Commission published the proposed AI Liability Directive. The Directive joins the Artificial Intelligence (AI) Act (which we wrote about here) as the latest addition…
TortsProf Blog
Robertson on Justifying Liabilities and Duties
Andrew Robertson has posted to SSRN Justifying Liabilities and Duties. The abstract provides:This chapter argues that a thorough consideration of the justifications for the law of obligations requires close attention to…
China Law Insight
证券虚假陈述责任新探（三）：交易因果关系的“推定”与“推翻”（上篇）
By King & Wood
作者：雷继平 王巍 证券虚假陈述责任纠纷相较于普通侵权纠纷的显著特色，是司法解释在《证券法》之外发展出的“推定交易因果关系”。新《虚假陈述解释》第11条延续了03年司法解释在交易因果关系上的“推定”原则，但在第12条又扩展了被告能够“推翻推定”的情形。如何理解原、被告在该问题上的博弈？本文对此探讨如下。 阅读更多