Skip to main content

Topic

Tip Pooling

148 published works

  1. Wage and Hour Defense Blog

    Tip Pools and Mandatory Service Charges – Wage and Hour Class Actions Continue to Target Hospitality Employers

    By EPSTEIN BECKER & GREEN, P.C.

    Another luxury New York hotel is the latest target in a constant stream of wage and hour class actions against the hotel and restaurant industry challenging the industry's practices relating…

  2. Wage and Hour Defense Blog

    Tip Pool May Include Employees Not Customarily Tipped If No Tip Credit is Taken

    By EPSTEIN BECKER & GREEN, P.C.

    In a landmark decision upholding the validity of the employer's mandatory tip pool, on February 23, 2010, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued its opinion in…

  3. California Employment Law Update

    Tip-Pooling Is Not Prohibited Under FLSA

    By Tony Oncidi

    Cumbie v. Woody Woo, Inc., 596 F.3d 577 (2010) Misty Cumbie worked as a waitress at the Vita Café (owned and operated by Woody Woo, Inc.). Woo required its servers…

  4. Employment & Labor

    Ninth Circuit Clarifies When Non-Tipped Employees May Participate In Tip Pools

    By Sheppard Mullin

    In case of first impression for it, the Ninth Circuit clarified the validity of tip pools under the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA") where the tip pool includes employees who…

  5. Labor & Employment Law Blog

    Ninth Circuit Clarifies When Non-Tipped Employees May Participate In Tip Pools

    By Sheppard Mullin

    In case of first impression for it, the Ninth Circuit clarified the validity of tip pools under the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA") where the tip pool includes employees who…

  6. California Employment Law Report

    CA Supreme Court denies review in Starbucks tip pooling case

    By Anthony Zaller

    The California Supreme Court denied review of a lower appellate court decision in the class action of Chau v. Starbucks. The issue in the case is whether store managers, who…

  7. California Employment Law Update

    Court Overturns $86 Million Judgment Awarded In Favor Of Starbucks Baristas

    By Tony Oncidi

    Chau v. Starbucks Corp., 174 Cal. App. 4th 688 (2009) Jou Chau, a former Starbucks “barista,” brought a class action against the company, challenging Starbucks’ policy of permitting shift supervisors…

  8. San Antonio Employment Law Blog

    Court Rules Tips Should be Shared

    By Thomas J. Crane

     You're a waiter.  Do you split your tips with the bussers?  How about with shift supervisors?  In a recent decision, the California appeals court found that the public expects the…

  9. California Employment Law Update

    California Court of Appeal Reverses $105m Judgment In Starbucks Case and Clarifies Permissible Tip-Allocation Practices

    By Proskauer Employment Law Group

    The California Court of Appeal has issued an important decision that has significant implications for California employers that have tip-sharing arrangements for their employees. In Chau v. Starbucks Corp., 2009…

  10. World of Employment

    Starbucks Obtains Reversal of $105 Million “Tip Sharing” Case

    By Dennis Westlind

    Just over a year ago, we reported about a $105 million California verdict in favor of Starbucks baristas who were required to pool their tips with supervisors.  As you might…