Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

The Nuts and Bolts of the Mississippi Statute of Limitations

By Adam Fischer on October 10, 2013
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Hurricane Karen made a name for herself last week when she swirled and blew into the Gulf Coast region. She shied away just before making an impact in Texas but made she made it a point to stop by the Mississippi Gulf Coast region. Previously, I gave you a snippet of the statute of limitations for Texas and Arkansas property claims. This week, I’ll give you a brief snapshot of the Mississippi statute of limitations so you can be ready for the next named storm.

Mississippi makes it clear: Statute of limitations for claims filed under Mississippi Tort Claims Act (MTCA)1 begins to run when all the elements of a tort, or cause of action, are present.

Under the judicially-created discovery rule, limitations period for Mississippi Tort Claims Act (MTCA) claims does not begin to run until all the elements of a tort exist, and the claimant knows or, in the exercise of reasonable diligence, should know of both the injury and the act or omission which caused it.

Here’s the statutory language:

17. Under Section 15–1–49(1) and (2) of the Mississippi Code:
(1) all actions for which no other period of limitation is prescribed shall be commenced within three (3) years next after the cause of such action accrued, and not after.
(2) in actions for which no other period of limitation is prescribed and which involve latent injury or disease, the cause of action does not accrue until the plaintiff has discovered, or by reasonable diligence should have discovered, the injury.

Here’s the statute put to work: In Oaks v. Sellers,2 the Mississippi Supreme Court applied this section to insurance cases, stating that “the three-year statute of limitations, pursuant to Miss.Code. Ann. § 15–1–49, began to run at the latest” when the insured received written notice from the insurer that his claim was denied.


1 Miss. Code § 11—46—11(3).
2 Oaks v. Sellers, 953 So.2d 1077, 1084 (Miss.2007).

  • Posted in:
    Insurance
  • Blog:
    Property Insurance Coverage Law Blog
  • Organization:
    Merlin Law Group, P.A.
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo