Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Wrestling with Independent Contractors

By Rene Ruiz on November 6, 2014
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

wrestlingVer la versión en español aquí

As I sit here watching professional wrestling with my son, it hits me. Vincent Kennedy McMahon, the Chairman of World Wrestling Entertainment, is a genius. First, Mr. McMahon has kept me interested in staged fights (with predetermined outcomes) for the majority of my life. Second, I marvel at how he has successfully monetized this phenomenon through ample merchandizing (I write this as my son’s many wrestling figures stare back at me). Finally, and most amazingly, he has built a billion-dollar industry using independent contractors (wrestlers).

Unlike other professional athletes, wrestlers, as non-employees cannot unionize. As independent contractors, wrestlers are also left without traditional employment benefits such as health insurance. While Vince McMahon is in many ways a modern-day P.T. Barnum, his enterprise remains a cautionary tale for most private sector employers today.

Various states and the federal government (and their respective courts) are increasingly scrutinizing independent contractor relationships, and more often than not concluding that they are actually misclassified employees. Here in Miami, U.S. Federal Magistrate Judge Goodman recently provisionally allowed a group of 500 exotic dancers to collectively pursue unpaid wage claims against a club that had classified them as independent contractors. This week, the Nevada Supreme Court also ruled that exotic dancers were employees, not independent contractors.

The Kansas Supreme Court recently found that 500 Federal Express drivers were employees, not independent contractors for state wage law purposes.

Last month, 800 newspaper delivery workers in San Diego settled their wage claims for $3.2 million after alleging that they were misclassified as independent contractors.

Employers that utilize independent contractors need to consult with counsel. They do not want to find themselves on the wrong side of a lawsuit. The outcome may be predetermined, and they may not have Vince’s “no holds barred” approach and resources to deal with the results.

Photo of Rene Ruiz Rene Ruiz
Read more about Rene RuizEmail
  • Posted in:
    Employment & Labor
  • Blog:
    BeLabor the Point
  • Organization:
    Stearns Weaver Miller Weissler Alhadeff & Sitterson, P.A.
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo