Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Long Awaited Guidance from the EEOC Regarding Wellness Programs!

By Chris Gantt-Sorenson on April 22, 2015
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

The EEOC has issued its long-awaited guidance on wellness programs and what is considered involuntary under the ADA.  The EEOC is the administrative agency charged with enforcing the ADA.  It issued a Notice of Proposed Rule Making (NPRM) of Proposed Rules on April 16 that provides guidance on the extent to which the ADA permits employers to offer incentives to employees who participate in wellness programs part of a group health plan. The Human Resource and Group Health Insurance Industries have been troubled by the EEOC’s approach to an employers’ use of incentives or penalties and what it considered “voluntary” participation in the context of wellness programs. In the Proposed Rule, the EEOC states: “[t]he Commission concludes that allowing certain incentives related to wellness programs, while limiting them to prevent economic coercion that could render provision of medical information involuntary, is the best way to effectuate the purposes of the wellness program provisions of  [the ACA and ADA].”

The Proposed Rule provides definitions of what the EEOC considers voluntary under the ADA, still requiring that employees not be required to participate.  The EEOC permits incentives or penalties that do not exceed thirty (30%) percent of the employee-only cost of the program.  The Proposed Rule also requires specific notice requirements to employees and special rules regarding confidentiality.

nosmokingA significant development is that tobacco incentives or penalties must be limited to 30% of employee-only health care coverage costs, rather than the 50% allowed by HIPAA and the ACA, if the tobacco-related wellness program involves disability-related inquiries or medical examinations.  The EEOC specifically stated that asking an employee if they still use tobacco is not a disability-related inquiry while a biometric exam to test for tobacco use is.  Many Employers and Plan Administrators already have programs that issue a 50% surcharge for tobacco users.  How can the EEOC’s provision be reconciled with what HIPAA and the ACA already allow? How will the EEOC’s new limit on incentives for participation in wellness programs that ask disability-related inquiries or require medical examinations affect the ACA’s tobacco incentive?

Photo of Chris Gantt-Sorenson Chris Gantt-Sorenson

Chris Gantt-Sorenson is a highly effective trial lawyer who concentrates in employment defense litigation. Chris chairs Haynsworth Sinkler Boyd’s Employment Law practice group and is a frequent contributor to the group’s SCEmployersBlog.

Read more about Chris Gantt-SorensonEmailChris's Linkedin Profile
  • Posted in:
    Employment & Labor
  • Blog:
    SC Employers’ Blog
  • Organization:
    Haynsworth Sinkler Boyd, P.A.
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo