Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

NLRB Overrules Obama-Era Rule Governing Union Protected Activity

By Jarad M. Lucan & Gregory A. Jones on January 18, 2019
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Once again, the Trump-era National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) has overruled a previous Obama-era Labor Board decision, establishing an objective test for determining whether statements made by an employee constitutes protected activity under the National Labor Relations Act.

The case, Alstate Maintenance, LLC and Greenidge, 367 NLRB No. 68 (2019), came before the Labor Board after an employee of Alstate, a skycap at JFK International Airport, was terminated when he refused to perform work based on the belief that the customer would not tip well, saying to his supervisor that “we did a similar job a year prior and we didn’t receive a tip for it.” Such a statement and action in the past may have been protected under the Labor Board’s decision in WorldMark by Wyndham, 356 NLRB 765 (2011), which set forth a bright line rule that “an employee who protests publicly in a group meeting is engaged in initiating group action.”

The NLRB in Alstate, however, determined that the rule in WorldMark could result in illogical and inconsistent outcomes, and improperly conflated group settings with group complaints. In reaching its decision, the NLRB stated that the Act only provides protections if two elements are satisfied: (1) the activity must be “concerted”, and (2) the activity must be engaged in for the purpose of mutual aid or protection. As such, an action by a single employee is concerted only if the person was authorized to act on behalf of a group or if the employee is trying to induce group action. In the case at issue, the NLRB noted that the employee was not intending to bring a group complaint to the attention of management, but was instead making an individual statement. The NLRB went on to rule that, “[t]he fact that a statement is made at a meeting, in a group setting or with other employees present will not automatically make the statement concerted activity.”

Despite the ruling in Alstate, employers should always take care to consider the circumstances under which employee statements are made before taking any kind of disciplinary action.

Photo of Jarad M. Lucan Jarad M. Lucan

Jarad is co-chair of Shipman’s Labor, Employment and Education Department, where he practices on behalf of both public and private sector clients.  Jarad has successfully represented employers in grievance arbitration matters, prohibited practice proceedings before the State Board of Labor Relations, and unfair…

Jarad is co-chair of Shipman’s Labor, Employment and Education Department, where he practices on behalf of both public and private sector clients.  Jarad has successfully represented employers in grievance arbitration matters, prohibited practice proceedings before the State Board of Labor Relations, and unfair labor practice proceedings before the National Labor Relations Board.  He has also represented employers in cases involving claims of discrimination and retaliation before the Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and State and Federal Courts.

Read more about Jarad M. LucanEmail
Show more Show less
Photo of Gregory A. Jones Gregory A. Jones

Gregory Jones is an associate in the firm’s Employer Defense and Labor Relations Practice Group. He assists both public and private sector clients in a wide range of labor and employment matters.

Prior to joining Shipman & Goodwin, Gregory served as a judicial…

Gregory Jones is an associate in the firm’s Employer Defense and Labor Relations Practice Group. He assists both public and private sector clients in a wide range of labor and employment matters.

Prior to joining Shipman & Goodwin, Gregory served as a judicial law clerk for both the Honorable Dennis Eveleigh (ret.) and the Honorable Raheem Mullins of the Connecticut Supreme Court. Before and during law school, he served as a Connecticut Police Officer.

Read more about Gregory A. JonesEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Employment & Labor
  • Blog:
    Employment Law Letter
  • Organization:
    Shipman & Goodwin LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo