Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Department of Labor Issues Final Rule on Calculating the Regular Rate of Pay Under the Fair Labor Standards Act

By James Hays, Sean Kirby & Jamie Moelis* on January 2, 2020
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

On December 12, 2019, for the first time in 60 years, the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) announced a final rule clarifying the types of benefits that must be included in determining an employee’s “regular rate of pay” when calculating overtime wages. This new rule becomes effective January 15, 2020.

The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) requires that non-exempt employees – employees who are eligible for overtime pay – be paid at least one-and-one half times their regular rate of pay for all hours worked over 40 in a workweek. The FLSA defines the regular rate as “all remuneration for employment paid to, or on behalf of, the employee” subject to certain exclusions outlined in section 7(e) of the FLSA. As employers have expanded the kinds of benefits they offer in recent years, it has become unclear which benefits need to be included and which can be excluded in determining an employee’s regular rate of pay.

The new rule clarifies that employers may exclude the following benefits when calculating an employee’s regular rate of pay:

  • The cost of providing certain parking benefits, wellness programs, onsite specialist treatment, gym access and fitness classes, employee discounts on retail goods and services, certain tuition benefits (whether paid to an employee, an education provider, or a student-loan program), and adoption assistance;
  • Payments for unused paid leave, including paid sick leave or paid time off;
  • Payments of certain penalties required under state and local scheduling laws;
  • Reimbursed expenses including cellphone plans, credentialing exam fees, organization membership dues, and travel, even if not incurred “solely” for the employer’s benefit;
  • Certain sign-on bonuses and certain longevity bonuses;
  • The cost of office coffee and snacks to employees as gifts;
  • Discretionary bonuses (the final rule clarifies that the label given to a bonus does not determine whether it is discretionary); and
  • Contributions to benefit plans for accident, unemployment, legal services, or other events that could cause future financial hardship or expense.

As a result of the final rule, employers may provide these benefits to non-exempt employees without including them in the calculation of their regular rate of pay for overtime purposes. Employers should review the final rule carefully to determine whether any of the clarifications are applicable to their workforce. We will continue monitoring developments in this area and will provide updates as new information becomes available.

*Jamie Moelis is a law clerk in Sheppard Mullin’s New York office.

Photo of James Hays James Hays

James Hays is of counsel in the firm’s New York office and a leader of the Traditional Labor Law Team.

Read more about James HaysEmail
Photo of Sean Kirby Sean Kirby

Sean Kirby is a partner in the Labor and Employment Practice Group in the firm’s New York Office.

Read more about Sean KirbyEmail
Photo of Jamie Moelis* Jamie Moelis*

Jamie Moelis is an associate in the Labor and Employment Practice Group in the firm’s New York office.

Email
  • Posted in:
    Employment & Labor
  • Blog:
    Labor & Employment Law Blog
  • Organization:
    Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo