Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupport
Contact Us
Search
Close

Federal Court Rejects Assembly Bill 51

By Bryan Hawkins on February 7, 2020
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Assembly Bill 51 (“AB 51”) prohibits employers from requiring employees to execute arbitration agreements as a condition of employment.  After being signed by California Governor Gavin Newsom on October 10, 2019, AB 51 was set to go into effect on January 1, 2020; however, on December 30, 2019, the Honorable Kimberly J. Mueller, Chief Judge in the Eastern District of California, granted a temporary restraining order enjoining its enforcement in a case brought by certain business groups, including the Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America and the California Chamber of Commerce.

On January 31, 2020, Judge Mueller issued a preliminary injunction enjoining the enforcement of AB 51 during the pendency of the litigation.  On February 7, 2020, Judge Mueller issued her full 36-page order.  In that order she provided a detailed analysis of the text of AB 51 along with its legislative history and the history of prior California legislation aimed at curtailing an employer’s ability to compel employees to waive certain rights.  The heart of the order, however, is Judge Mueller’s conclusion that AB 51 was likely preempted by the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”) because AB 51 (1) “singled out arbitration by placing uncommon barriers on employers who required contractual waivers of dispute resolution options that bear the defining features of arbitration” and (2) interferes with the goals of the FAA.

The parties to the action will assuredly continue their fight in the courts.  In the meantime, California employers can continue to require their employees to execute arbitration agreements as a requirement of employment.

Photo of Bryan Hawkins Bryan Hawkins

Bryan Hawkins Bryan Hawkins is a litigator practicing in the firm’s Labor & Employment group with extensive jury and bench-trial experience in representing employers in employment-related litigation in court and before administrative agencies such as the Department of Fair Employment and Housing and…

Bryan Hawkins Bryan Hawkins is a litigator practicing in the firm’s Labor & Employment group with extensive jury and bench-trial experience in representing employers in employment-related litigation in court and before administrative agencies such as the Department of Fair Employment and Housing and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. His practice also involves counseling employers on employment-related issues, including handbooks and policies. Bryan also provides counseling on labor issues, such as advising employers on how to effectively respond to union organizing campaigns, negotiate collective bargaining agreements, and manage the employer/union relationship. In addition, Bryan’s practice includes litigating complex commercial disputes in areas such as antitrust, business torts, and real estate.

Click here for Bryan Hawkins’ full bio.

Read more about Bryan HawkinsEmailBryan's Linkedin Profile
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Arbitration and ADR, Employment & Labor
  • Blog:
    World of Employment
  • Organization:
    Stoel Rives LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo