Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

EEOC Proposes New Rules Regarding Conciliation

By Doug Schnee on October 13, 2020
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

In a previous post on July 22, 2020, we reported on the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission’s (“EEOC”) Pilot Program which modified certain aspects of the EEOC’s mediation program. In October, 2020, the EEOC announced proposed changes to its conciliation process.  Conciliation differs from mediation in that mediation provides both parties an opportunity to mediate and potentially resolve a charge of discrimination shortly after it is filed and before the EEOC begins its investigation. Conciliation is a voluntary alternative to litigation which arises after the EEOC has investigated a charge and determined reasonable cause exists that an employer has discriminated against an employee.

Between 2016 and 2019, the EEOC conciliation process effectively resolved only 41.23% of discrimination charges where a reasonable cause finding was made against an employer. In an effort to improve the conciliation process, the EEOC is proposing amendments that will increase the amount of information available to an employer to make settlement of charges more likely.  In particular, a brief summary of the EEOC’s proposed amendments are as follows:

  • The EEOC will provide employers with a written summary of known facts and non-privileged information the EEOC relied on in making its findings. This includes identifying aggrieved employees for whom the EEOC is seeking relief.  Additionally, the EEOC will have discretion to provide detailed information to an employer such as identities of alleged harassers or supervisors and if a class action is being pursued, the estimated size of the proposed class.
  • The EEOC will provide a summary to the employer of the legal basis for a finding of reasonable cause. If there was any doubt that reasonable cause existed to believe discrimination occurred, the EEOC will explain how reasonable cause existed despite this information. The EEOC may also provide a response to any defenses raised by an employer.
  • The EEOC will provide employers with a basis for a request for monetary relief including any calculations underlying the proposal and will provide the employer at least 14 calendar days to respond to the initial settlement proposal.

The EEOC’s proposed rules are subject to comment from interested parties and have not yet been adopted.  If the EEOC implements these new amendments, employers are likely to have a better understanding as to how the EEOC reached its determination, as well as its rationale for any relief it is seeking on behalf of an aggrieved employee. Previously, the EEOC was under no obligation to provide this information, which often left employers with insufficient information to determine if a settlement should be considered prior to the EEOC filing litigation against the employer.

Photo of Doug Schnee Doug Schnee

Doug focuses his practice on employment litigation and counseling on human resource issues. His employment litigation experience includes representing employers before state and federal courts and administrative agencies in Ohio and throughout the region in wrongful termination, retaliation and discrimination matters arising under…

Doug focuses his practice on employment litigation and counseling on human resource issues. His employment litigation experience includes representing employers before state and federal courts and administrative agencies in Ohio and throughout the region in wrongful termination, retaliation and discrimination matters arising under the Ohio Civil Rights Act, the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), Title VII, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, the Fair Labor Standards Act, and the Family and Medical Leave Act. Doug is also experienced in litigating matters involving employment and non-compete agreements. Doug also served as a judicial law clerk to Judge Stephen R. Shaw in the Court of Appeals of Ohio, Third Appellate District.

Read more about Doug SchneeEmailDoug's Linkedin Profile
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Employment & Labor
  • Blog:
    Labor & Employment Law Navigator
  • Organization:
    Frantz Ward LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo