Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

How are Optional Coverages Applied?

By Merlin Law Group on February 19, 2022
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
examining insurance policy

Policies may include many different optional coverages, such as, but not limited to, “Agreed Value,” “Actual Cash Value,” and “Replacement Cost” coverages. These coverages can be applied depending on the type or amount of damages. To understand better these types of optional coverages, one must read and verify the policy.

This is the issue the Puerto Rico Court of Appeals discussed in Asociacion de Titulares Condominio Rincon Ocean Club LI v. Multinational Insurance Company,1 where the trial court granted partial summary judgment in favor of the Defendant and applied Actual Cash Value coverage instead of the Agreed Value coverage, which the Plaintiff alleged applied.

In this case, the Condominium’s policy as a general rule stated that the insurer had the option to determine the value, including but not limited to the “Actual Cash Value,” of the property. However, the policy also stated that “Optional Coverages” existed and could be agreed upon between the parties. The referred “Optional Coverages” included “Agreed Value” and “Replacement Cost,” therefore, the insured could select the optional coverage and pact the value with the insurer, but this had to be stated in a clause of the policy. The parties had selected the coverage option of “Agreed Value,” and they argued that the only effect it had was that the “Coinsurance” did not apply to the property. After reviewing the clauses, the appellate court held that per the policy, there was no such limitation.

The appellate court held that the parties did agree to the value of the property even though it wasn’t clear the value method agreed on. Therefore, the court had erred in granting summary judgment because the intention of the parties had to be considered in an evidentiary hearing. The court of appeals determined that the redaction of the policy was “obscured,” and it was important to consider the intention of the parties to understand which optional coverage applied and reversed the trial court’s partial summary judgment.
_______________________________________________________
1 Asociacion de Titulares Condominio Rincon Ocean Club LI v. Multinational Ins. Co., 2021 PR App. Lexis 2690 (P.R. App. Oct. 22, 2021).

  • Posted in:
    Insurance
  • Blog:
    Property Insurance Coverage Law Blog
  • Organization:
    Merlin Law Group, P.A.
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo