Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherBrowse by ChannelAbout the NetworkJoin the NetworkProductsSub-MenuProducts OverviewBlog ProBlog PlusBlog PremierMicrositeSyndication PortalsAbout UsContactSubscribeSupport
Book a Demo
Search
Close

FTC Explores Potential Regulations To Prohibit “Junk” Fees

By Jason Howell, Amanda Beane, Nathan Kosnoff & Erik Tuvey on November 16, 2022
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Key Update:

  • The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) is considering rulemaking to curb unfair and deceptive fees.
  • The FTC seeks comments on the effects of such fees and the methods companies may employ to impose them.

The FTC recently asked for public comments about “junk fees,” defining such fees as one of the following:

  • Fees for services that add little or no value (and that consumers would expect to be included in the overall advertised price); and
  • Hidden fees that a seller only discloses late in the purchasing process (or not at all).

While these types of fees can be found in various industries, the FTC indicated that they are often found in the travel, telecommunications, and live entertainment (e.g., concerts, sporting events) industries. For example, the FTC expressed concerns that hotel “resort fees” disclosed late in the booking process or after a guest has arrived at the hotel hinder comparison shopping. According to one study, resort fees are rising faster than published room rates. These added costs can facilitate inflation, which is of concern to politicians and other authorities at this time.

The FTC seeks feedback on areas where additional rulemaking could allow it to be more effective in enforcement and industry education outreach. In particular, the FTC wants to increase its enforcement authority and make it easier for consumers to obtain redress.

This announcement follows the FTC’s publication of a petition for rulemaking on the practice of “drip pricing” in December 2021 and a report on “dark patterns” in September 2022. The FTC used public comments from the December petition to justify its investigation into junk fees in this latest announcement, emphasizing that dark patterns may be used to obscure and collect such fees. The agency’s announcement coincides with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s (CFPB) declaration that it is also investigating “junk data.”

Photo of Jason Howell Jason Howell

Jason Howell serves as co-chair of the Advertising, Marketing & Promotions practice and as a member of the Trademark, Copyright & Media practice.

Read more about Jason HowellEmail
Photo of Amanda Beane Amanda Beane

Amanda Beane serves as co-chair of the Advertising, Marketing & Promotions practice.

Read more about Amanda BeaneEmail
Photo of Nathan Kosnoff Nathan Kosnoff

Nathan Kosnoff has experience working on a broad range of matters, including intellectual property and trademark disputes, antitrust, construction defect litigation, campaign finance law, and government and internal investigations.

Read more about Nathan KosnoffEmail
Erik Tuvey

Erik Tuvey advises a wide range of clients, from startups to Fortune 500 companies, in various practice areas, including advertising, marketing and promotions, commercial contracting, and dispute resolution. Erik has worked directly in client organizations through remote and on-site secondments, providing immediate legal…

Erik Tuvey advises a wide range of clients, from startups to Fortune 500 companies, in various practice areas, including advertising, marketing and promotions, commercial contracting, and dispute resolution. Erik has worked directly in client organizations through remote and on-site secondments, providing immediate legal support when needed and seamless interaction with outside counsel for more complex issues.

Read more about Erik TuveyEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Corporate & Commercial
  • Blog:
    Consumer Protection Review
  • Organization:
    Perkins Coie LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

LexBlog, Inc. logo
Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
Real Lawyers
99 Park Row
  • About LexBlog
  • Careers
  • Press
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Privacy Policy
  • Editorial Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Service
  • RSS Terms of Service
  • Products
  • Blog Pro
  • Blog Plus
  • Blog Premier
  • Microsite
  • Syndication Portals
  • LexBlog Community
  • Resource Center
  • 1-800-913-0988
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
  • Resource Center
  • Blogging 101

New to the Network

  • Tennessee Insurance Litigation Blog
  • Claims & Sustains
  • New Jersey Restraining Order Lawyers
  • New Jersey Gun Lawyers
  • Blog of Reason
Copyright © 2025, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo