Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupport
Contact Us
Search
Close

Recap of Employment Laws Passed in Connecticut’s 2023 General Assembly Session

By Daniel Schwartz & Keegan Drenosky on June 13, 2023
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Connecticut’s 2023 General Assembly concluded last week. But for the first time in many years, many of the major pieces of legislation in the labor and employment area did not pass. In fact, the legislative session will ultimately be thought of for the bills that died on the floor, rather than for the bills that passed.  

In this post, we will recap the key points from this past term, highlight the enacted laws and shed light on some close calls that could have had significant implications.

Enacted Laws:

Revisions to State Wage Law in the Budget Implementer:

  • Budget Bill HB 6941  
  • As Amended by House Amendment “A” 
  • As Amended by House Amendment “B”  

Connecticut’s prevailing wage law underwent amendments to extend coverage to contractors providing “security services.” Effective from October 1, 2023, the bill also mandates contractors to adhere to standard wage rates and make any necessary adjustments annually. The law also enhances enforcement provisions, enabling aggrieved employees to bring civil actions in Superior Court, providing employee rights and remedies for violations.

Expanding Workers’ Compensation Coverage for Post-Traumatic Stress Injuries:

Public Act No. 23-35, enacted on June 5, 2023, expanded the definition of “employee” to allow nearly all workers, beyond first responders, to claim workers’ compensation benefits for certain qualifying events related to post-traumatic stress injuries. The act also aligns the recovery options for employees with those available to first responders.

Other Enacted Bills:

Although not as consequential, several bills were passed that address various aspects of administration, employee benefits, and compliance. 

These include:

  • HB 6552: Implements the administration recommendations of the Connecticut Retirement Security Program.
  • SB 228: Permits unionized employees on strike to be eligible for health benefits through the state’s health insurance exchange.
  • SB 984: Modifies the process for hiring state employees.
  • SB 1123: Includes residential construction in prevailing wage contract rates.
  • SB 1124: Requires a study on state service hiring practices.
  • SB 805: Requires the state labor department to study data breaches and false unemployment claims.
  • HB 6549: Implements recommendations by modifying and repealing obsolete provisions and statutes relevant to the Department of Labor.
  • SB 1040: Permits remote notarization of documents under specified conditions.
  • HB 6826: Expands Connecticut’s False Claims Act to apply to most state programs and benefits.
  • SB 3: Sets up data privacy requirements for businesses, but with little impact on employment law.

Close Calls:

While several bills were passed, there were also some close calls that narrowly missed becoming law. These bills, had they been enacted, could have had significant implications for employers. Here are a few notable examples:

  • Non-Compete Legislation (HB 6594): This bill aimed to invalidate most non-compete agreements unless specific conditions were met but did not progress further.
  • Trade Association Group Health Plans (HB 6710): This bipartisan effort sought to allow trade associations to offer large group health plans to members but faced strong opposition from patient advocacy groups and did not receive a vote.
  • Protection of Warehouse Workers (Senate Substitute Bill 152, as amended by Senate Amendment “A”): Approved by the Senate but not voted on in the House, this bill aimed to limit unreasonable production quotas and prohibit adverse employment actions based on quotas in certain warehouse distribution centers.
  • Expanding CT Paid Sick Leave Law (SB 1178, 1179, as amended by Senate Amendment “A”): These proposals aimed to expand paid sick leave coverage to all private sector employers, broaden the range of family members covered, increase the rate of accrual, and broaden the reasons for using leave. The bills made progress but ultimately died in the House.

Conclusion: After a busy few years including creation of paid leave benefits and increases in Connecticut’s minimum wage law, the 2023 legislative session was a relatively quiet one. Nevertheless, employers should stay informed about these legislative changes and be prepared for potential future developments in employment law. Use this time to update handbooks and policies and ensure that you have kept up with all the developments in the law.  

Photo of Daniel Schwartz Daniel Schwartz

Dan represents employers in various employment law matters such as employment discrimination, restrictive covenants, human resources, retaliation and whistle blowing, and wage and hour issues. He has extensive trial and litigation experience in both federal and state courts in a variety of areas…

Dan represents employers in various employment law matters such as employment discrimination, restrictive covenants, human resources, retaliation and whistle blowing, and wage and hour issues. He has extensive trial and litigation experience in both federal and state courts in a variety of areas, including commercial litigation and trade secret enforcement. Dan is the author of the independent Connecticut Employment Law Blog. The blog discusses new and noteworthy events in labor and employment law on a daily basis.

Read more about Daniel SchwartzEmailDaniel's Linkedin ProfileDaniel's Twitter Profile
Show more Show less
Photo of Keegan Drenosky Keegan Drenosky

Keegan Drenosky practices in the area of labor and employment law and business litigation. She has represented employers in cases involving claims of discrimination and retaliation before the Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and state and federal…

Keegan Drenosky practices in the area of labor and employment law and business litigation. She has represented employers in cases involving claims of discrimination and retaliation before the Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and state and federal Court.

Read more about Keegan DrenoskyEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Employment & Labor
  • Blog:
    Employment Law Letter
  • Organization:
    Shipman & Goodwin LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo